Now showing items 1-2 of 2

    • The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses 

      Mustafa, Reem A.; Santesso, Nancy; Brozek, Jan; Akl, Elie A.; Walter, Stephen D.; Norman, Geoff; Kulasegaram, Mahan; Christensen, Robin; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Falck Ytter, Yngve; Chang, Stephanie; Hassan Murad, Mohammad; Vist, Gunn E.; Lasserson, Toby; Gartlehner, Gerald; Shukla, Vijay; Sun, Xin; Whittington, Craig; Post, Piet N.; Lang, Eddy; Thaler, Kylie; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Alenius, Heidi; Meerpohl, Joerg J.; Alba, Ana C.; Nevis, Immaculate F.; Gentles, Stephen; Ethier, Marie Chantal; Carrasco Labra, Raúl; Khatib, Rasha; Nesrallah, Gihad; Kroft, Jamie; Selk, Amanda; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Schünemann, Holger J. (Elsevier, 2013)
      Objective: We evaluated the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of assessing the quality of evidence (QoE) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Study Design and Setting: ...
    • Improving GRADE evidence tables part 3: detailed guidance for explanatory footnotes supports creating and understanding GRADE certainty in the evidence judgments 

      Santesso, Nancy; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Langendam, Miranda; Brignardello Petersen, Romina; Mustafa, Reem; Heus, Pauline; Lasserson, Toby; Opiyo, Newton; Kunnamo, Ilkka; Sinclair, David; Garner, Paul; Treweek, Shaun; Tovey, David; Akl, Elie; Tugwell, Peter; Brozek, Jan; Guyatt, Gordon H.; Schunemann, Holger (Elsevier, 2016)
      Background: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) is widely used and reliable and accurate for assessing the certainty in the body of health evidence. The GRADE working group has ...