Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBozzini, Giorgio 
Authordc.contributor.authorBerti, Lorenzo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMaltagliati, Matteo 
Authordc.contributor.authorBesana, Umberto 
Authordc.contributor.authorCalori, Alberto 
Authordc.contributor.authorMüller, Alexander 
Authordc.contributor.authorSighinolfi, Maria Chiara 
Authordc.contributor.authorMicali, Salvatore 
Authordc.contributor.authorPastore, Antonio Luigi 
Authordc.contributor.authorLedezma Rojas, Rodrigo 
Authordc.contributor.authorBroggini, Paolo 
Authordc.contributor.authorRocco, Bernardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorBuizza, Carlo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T22:40:14Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-01-25T22:40:14Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2020
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Urology Sep 2020es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1007/s00345-020-03442-2
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178328
Abstractdc.description.abstractPurpose To assess the effects of a new ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP) technique on sexual functions and micturition, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to evaluate how the surgical technique of ES-ThuLEP can lead to ejaculation preservation. Methods A prospective study was carried out between January 2015 and January 2018 on patients with surgical indication for BPH, who wished to preserve ejaculation. The patients were treated with ES-ThuLEP and were evaluated before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Three validated questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTSsex, IIEF-5 and IPSS) were used to assess changes in ejaculation, erectile function and urinary symptoms. Uroflowmetry (Qmax and Qavg), post-void residual volume and voided volume were also evaluated, to assess micturition improvement. Patients with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student'sttest, Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results Two hundred and eighty three patients were enrolled. Ejaculation was spared in 203 and 219 patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. No significant differences were observed between erectile function before and after surgery: baseline IIEF-5 = 16.2 +/- 4.47 vs 16.7 +/- 2.9 (p = 0.419) and 17.7 +/- 3.2 (p = 0.410) at 3 and 6 months. Significant improvement in urinary symptoms was achieved: baseline IPSS = 19.4 +/- 7.24 vs 5.8 +/- 4.3 (p = 0.032) and 3.9 +/- 4.1 (p = 0.029) at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion ES-ThuLEP effectively preserved ejaculation in over two thirds of the patients without compromising micturition improvement or erectile function. ES-ThuLEP could be a valid treatment option for BPH in young and sexually active men.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherSpringeres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceWorld Journal of Urologyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEjaculationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEjaculatory dysfunctiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEjaculation sparinges_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBenign prostatices_ES
Títulodc.titleEjaculation‑sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES‑ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohortes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso Abierto
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlajes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile