Phylogenetic relationships among tribes in Xylocopinae (Apidae) and implications on nest structure evolution
Author
dc.contributor.author
Flores Prado, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Flores Carrasco, Sergio
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
McAllister, Bryant
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-03-25T18:32:13Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-03-25T18:32:13Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2010-07
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, No. 57, 2010. pp. 237-244.
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/122055
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The subfamily Xylocopinae has been recognized as the most basal lineage within the family Apidae, comprising
four tribes; Allodapini, Ceratinini, Xylocopini and Manueliini. Relationships among the tribes are
not well resolved with morphological data. In particular, Manueliini and Xylocopini have each been
placed as the most basal lineage in separate analyses of the subfamily. While relationships within each
tribe, excepting Manueliini, have been investigated using molecular data, these data have not been
applied to examine the relationships among tribes, which remain controversial. Here we present results
of molecular phylogenetic analyses using sequences of CoI, Cytb and EF-1aF1 from members of the four
tribes of Xylocopinae. We used available data from other studies in combination with data generated for
the three species of Manueliini. Competing phylogenetic hypotheses regarding the alternate positions
proposed to Manueliini and Xylocopini were evaluated through statistical tests. The basal position of
either Manueliini or Xylocopini has contrasting implications on the evolutionary history of nest architecture,
which mediates the potential for contact between adult and immature individuals. Our results indicate
that Manueliini is the most basal lineage of Xylocopinae, in agreement with an evolutionary
transition from nests having completely sealed cells to nests lacking cells. A nest structure with closed
cells prevents physical interactions between adult and immature stages, whereas an open structure provides
the opportunity for interactions that may play an important role in the emergence of sociality.