Vocal Economy in Vocally Trained Actresses and Untrained Female Subjects
Author
dc.contributor.author
Master, Suely
Author
dc.contributor.author
Guzmán Noriega, Marco
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dowdall, Jayme
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-13T14:58:06Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-13T14:58:06Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of Voice, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 698-704
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.05.005
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/123605
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Summary: Objectives. Vocally trained actresses are expected to have more vocal economy than nonactresses.
Therefore, we hypothesize that there will be differences in the electroglottogram-based voice economy parameter
quasi-output cost ratio (QOCR) between actresses and nonactresses. This difference should remain across different
levels of intensity.
Methods. A total of 30 actresses and 30 nonactresses were recruited for this study. Participants from both groups were
required to sustain the vowels /a/, /i/, and /u/, in habitual, moderate, and high intensity levels. Acoustic variables such as
sound pressure level (SPL), fundamental frequency (F0), and glottal contact quotient (CQ) were obtained. The QOCR
was then calculated.
Results. There were no significant differences among the groups for QOCR. Positive correlations were observed for
QOCR versus SPL and QOCR versus F0 in all intensity levels. Negative correlation was found between QOCR and CQ
in all intensity levels. Considering the differences among intensity levels, from habitual to moderate and from moderate
to loud, only the CQ did not differ significantly. The QOCR, SPL, and F0 presented significant differences throughout
the different intensity levels.
Conclusion. The QOCR did not reflect the level of vocal training when comparing trained and nontrained female subjects
in the present study. Both groups demonstrated more vocal economy in moderate and high intensity levels owing to
more voice output without an increase in glottal adduction.