Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBasso Sotz, Leonardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorJara Díaz, Sergio es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2008-12-10T10:18:44Z
Available datedc.date.available2008-12-10T10:18:44Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2006-06
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationNETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS Volume: 6 Issue: 2 Pages: 149-162 Published: JUN 2006en
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1566-113X
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/124757
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn order to produce a certain vector of flows over a fixed-size network, a transport firm has to choose, among many other things, a route structure. In accommodating increasing traffic, transport firms will adjust their route structure to minimize costs. However, transport industry structure analysis considers only, often implicitly, the case where the route structure is fixed. In this paper, economies of density, that represents the latter, are conceptually distinguished from economies of scale on fixed-size networks, S, where we allow the route structure to vary. Intuition with a simple example, evidence from the airline industry and the derivation of a formula to calculate S from an estimated cost function are provided. Results are both novel and encouraging. Transport firms, while closer to exhaust economies of density, would still have available sizeable economies of scale.en
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen
Publisherdc.publisherSPRINGERen
Keywordsdc.subjectLíneas aéreas--Estados Unidosen
Títulodc.titleDistinguishing multiproduct economies of scale from economies of density on a fixed-size transport networken
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record