THE BASIC PUBLIC FINANCE OF PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
Author
dc.contributor.author
Engel Goetz, Eduardo
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Fischer Barkan, Ronald
Author
dc.contributor.author
Galetovic Potsch, Alexander
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-13T14:59:12Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-13T14:59:12Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013-02
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Journal of the European Economic Association February 2013 11(1):83–111
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01105.x
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126215
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI.
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Publicprivate partnerships (PPPs) have been justified because they release public funds or save on distortionary taxes. However, the resources saved by a government that does not finance the upfront investment are offset by giving up future revenue flows to the concessionaire. If a PPP can be justified on efficiency grounds, the PPP contract that optimally balances demand risk, user-fee distortions, and the opportunity cost of public funds has a minimum revenue guarantee and a revenue cap. The optimal contract can be implemented via a competitive auction with reasonable informational requirements. The optimal revenue guarantees, revenue sharing agreements, and auction mechanisms are different from those observed in the real world. In particular, the optimal contract duration is shorter in demand states where the revenue cap binds. These results also have implications for budgetary accounting of PPPs, as they show that their fiscal impact resembles that of public provision, rather than privatization.