Comparison of dynamic control strategies for transit operations
Author
dc.contributor.author
Muñoz, Juan Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cortés Carrillo, Cristián
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Giesen, Ricardo
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sáez Hueichapán, Doris
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Delgado, Felipe
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Valencia, Francisca
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cipriano, Aldo
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-01-24T18:22:45Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-01-24T18:22:45Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Transportation Research Part C 28 (2013) 101–113
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.12.010
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126278
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Real-time headway-based control is a key issue to reduce bus bunching in high frequency
urban bus services where schedules are difficult to implement. Several mechanisms have
been proposed in the literature, but very few performance comparisons are available. In
this paper two different approaches are tested over eight different scenarios. Both methodologies
solve the same problem, the former based on a deterministic optimization over a
long-term rolling horizon, while the latter proposes a hybrid predictive approach considering
a shorter horizon and a stochastic evolution of the system. The comparison is conducted
through scenarios that include three different dimensions: (i) bus capacities
which can be reached or not, (ii) service frequencies, considering high and medium
frequency services and (iii) different load profiles along the corridor. The results show that
the deterministic approach performs better under scenarios where bus capacity could be
reached frequently along the route while the hybrid predictive control approach performs
better in situations where this does not happen.