Letting Alice and Bob choose which problem to solve: Implications to the study of cellular automata
Author
dc.contributor.author
Briceño, Raimundo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rapaport Zimermann, Iván
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-02-11T14:54:35Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-02-11T14:54:35Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Theoretical Computer Science 468 (2013) 1–11
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2012.11.011
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126379
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In previous works we found necessary conditions for a cellular automaton (CA) in order
to be intrinsically universal (a CA is said to be intrinsically universal if it can simulate any
other). The idea was to introduce different canonical communication problems, all of them
parameterized by a CA. The necessary condition was the following: if Ψ is an intrinsically
universal CA then the communication complexity of all the canonical problems, when
parameterized byΨ, must be maximal. In this paper, instead of introducing a new canonical
problem, we study the setting where they can all be used simultaneously. Roughly speaking,
when Alice and Bob – the two parties of the communication complexity model – receive
their inputs they may choose online which canonical problem to solve. We give results
showing that such freedom makes this new problem, that we call Ovrl, a very strong filter
for ruling out CAs from being intrinsically universal. More precisely, there are some CAs
having high complexity in all the canonical problems but have much lower complexity in
Ovrl.