On the multiplicity of supernovae within host galaxies
Author
dc.contributor.author
Anderson, J. P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soto, M.
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-03-06T19:53:35Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-03-06T19:53:35Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
A&A 550, A69 (2013)
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220600
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126419
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Aims. We investigate the nature of multiple supernova hosting galaxies, and the types of events that they produce.
Methods. Using all known historical supernovae, we split host galaxies into samples containing single or multiple events. These
samples are then characterised in terms of their relative supernova fractions and host properties.
Results. In multiple supernova hosts the ratio of type Ia to core-collapse events is lower than in single supernova hosts. For corecollapse
events there is a suggestion that the ratio of types Ibc to type II events is higher in multiples than within single supernova
hosts. This second increase is dominated by an increase in the number of SNIb. Within multiple supernova hosts, supernovae of any
given type appear to “prefer” to explode in galaxies that are host to the same type of SN. We also find that multiple SN hosts have
higher T-type morphologies.
Conclusions. While our results suffer from low number statistics, we speculate that their simplest interpretation is that star formation
within galaxies is generally of an episodic and bursty nature. This leads to the supernovae detected within any particular galaxy to be
dominated by those with progenitors of a specific age, rather than a random selection from standard relative supernova rates, as the
latter would be expected if star formation was of a long-term continuous nature. We further discuss the supernova progenitor and star
formation properties that may be important for understanding these trends, and also comment on a range of important selection effects
within our sample.