Antiferromagnetic Ising model in triangulations with applications to counting perfect matchings
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez, Andrea
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kiwi Krauskopf, Marcos
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-11T18:42:21Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-11T18:42:21Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Discrete Applied Mathematics 172 (2014) 45–61
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2014.02.016
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126527
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In this workwegive a lower bound for the groundstate degeneracy of the antiferromagnetic
Ising model in the class of stack triangulations, also known as planar 3-trees. The geometric
dual graphs of stack triangulations form a class, say C, of cubic bridgeless planar graphs,
i.e. G ∈ C iff its geometric dual graph is a planar 3-tree. As a consequence, we show that
every graph G ∈ C has at least 3·ϕ(|V(G)|+8)/30 ≥ 3·2(|V(G)|+8)/44 distinct perfect matchings,
where ϕ is the golden ratio. Our bound improves (slightly) upon the 3·2(|V(G)|+12)/60 bound
obtained by Cygan, Pilipczuk, and Škrekovski (2013) for the number of distinct perfect
matchings also for graphs G ∈ C with at least 8 nodes.
Our work builds on an alternative perspective relating the number of perfect matchings
of cubic bridgeless planar graphs and the number of so called groundstates of the widely
studied Ising model from statistical physics. With hindsight, key steps of our work can be
rephrased in terms of standard graph theoretic concepts, without resorting to terminology
from statistical physics. Throughout, we draw parallels between the terminology we rely
on and some of the concepts introduced/developed independently elsewhere.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
The first author gratefully acknowledges the support of CNPq (Proc. 477203/2012-4) and FAPESP (Proc. 2011/19978-
5) Brazil. The second author gratefully acknowledges the support of Millennium Nucleus Information and Coordination in
Networks ICM/FIC P10-024F and CONICYT via Basal in Applied Mathematics and FONDECYT 1090227.