Molecular outflows driven by low-mass protostars. I. Correcting for underestimates when measuring outflow masses and dynamical properties
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dunham, Michael M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Arce, Héctor G.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mardones Pérez, Diego
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lee, Jeong Eun
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Matthews, Brenda C.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Stutz, Amelia M.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Williams, Jonathan P.
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-12T13:31:15Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-12T13:31:15Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014-03-01
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
The Astrophysical Journal, 783:29 (30pp), 2014 March 1
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/29
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126536
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
We present a survey of 28 molecular outflows driven by low-mass protostars, all of which are sufficiently isolated
spatially and/or kinematically to fully separate into individual outflows. Using a combination of new and archival
data from several single-dish telescopes, 17 outflows are mapped in 12CO (2–1) and 17 are mapped in 12CO (3–2),
with 6 mapped in both transitions. For each outflow, we calculate and tabulate the mass (Mflow), momentum (Pflow),
kinetic energy (Eflow), mechanical luminosity (Lflow), and force (Fflow) assuming optically thin emission in LTE
at an excitation temperature, Tex, of 50 K. We show that all of the calculated properties are underestimated when
calculated under these assumptions. Taken together, the effects of opacity, outflow emission at low velocities
confused with ambient cloud emission, and emission below the sensitivities of the observations increase outflow
masses and dynamical properties by an order of magnitude, on average, and factors of 50–90 in the most extreme
cases. Different (and non-uniform) excitation temperatures, inclination effects, and dissociation of molecular gas
will all work to further increase outflow properties. Molecular outflows are thus almost certainly more massive and
energetic than commonly reported. Additionally, outflow properties are lower, on average, by almost an order of
magnitude when calculated from the 12CO (3–2) maps compared to the 12CO (2–1) maps, even after accounting
for different opacities, map sensitivities, and possible excitation temperature variations. It has recently been argued
in the literature that the 12CO (3–2) line is subthermally excited in outflows, and our results support this finding.