Changes of glaciers in the Andes of Chile and priorities for future work
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pellicciotti, F.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ragettli, S.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carenzo, M.
es_CL
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mc Phee Torres, James
es_CL
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2014-12-15T20:35:38Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2014-12-15T20:35:38Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Science of the Total Environment 493 (2014) 1197–1210
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.055
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/126622
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Glaciers in the Andes of Chile seem to be shrinking and possibly loosing mass, but the number and types of studies
conducted, constrained mainly by data availability, are not sufficient to provide a synopsis of glacier changes
for the past or future or explain in an explicitway causes of the observed changes. In this paper, we provide a systematic
review of changes in glaciers for the entire country, followed by a discussion of the studies that have provided
evidence of such changes. Weidentify a missing type ofwork in distributed, physically-oriented modelling
studies that are needed to bridge the gap between the numerous remote sensing studies and the specific, point
scale works focused on process understanding. We use an advanced mass balance model applied to one of the
best monitored glaciers in the region to investigate four main research issues that should be addressed in modelling
studies for a sound assessment of glacier changes: 1) the use of physically-based models of glacier ablation
(energy balance models) versus more empirical models (enhanced temperature index approaches); 2) the importance
of the correct extrapolation of air temperature forcing on glaciers and in high elevation areas and the
large uncertainty in model outputs associated with it; 3) the role played by snow gravitational redistribution;
and 4) the uncertainty associated with future climate scenarios.We quantify differences in model outputs associated
with each of these choices, and conclude with suggestions for future work directions.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
This work was carried out in the framework of the European Project
ACQWA, Grant Agreement Number 212250.