Segmentación de consumidores según su actitud frente al bienestar animal en Santiago y Viña del Mar
Professor Advisor
dc.contributor.advisor
Köbrich Grüebler, Claus
Author
dc.contributor.author
Matas Obreque, Cristobal Eduardo
Staff editor
dc.contributor.editor
Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias
Staff editor
dc.contributor.editor
Departamento de Fomento de la Producción Animal
Associate professor
dc.contributor.other
Maino Menéndez, Mario
Associate professor
dc.contributor.other
Mora González, Marcos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-07-02T19:12:00Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-07-02T19:12:00Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2013
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/131635
General note
dc.description
Memoria para optar al Título Profesional de Médico Veterinario
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
An alternative to add value to beef is the incorporation of confidence attributes, one of which might be to guarantee that it has been produced under procedures of animal welfare. In order for this strategy to be successful, it is relevant to know if there are consumer segments that value these attributes and which are their characteristics. This work looks into these issues using a survey previously used in the European Union by Welfare Quality®. From the original survey we selected questions that explore the attitude toward animal welfare and applied it to 450 persons in the cities of Santiago and Viña del Mar. Three consumer segments were identified using factor analysis and cluster analysis. The first segment corresponds to Emotional Consumers (32% of the sample) who were looking for better animal welfare, though without having to pay extra. The second segment is called Conscious Consumers (49% of the sample), who are aware of the need to adopt measures related to animal welfare, even if it means to pay more. The last segment, called Indifferent Consumers (19% of the sample), has a more functional perspective, since animal welfare is not important for them, believing that it does not bring benefits and are thus not ready to pay for animal welfare