Independent and Hitting Sets of Rectangles Intersecting a Diagonal Line: Algorithms and Complexity
Author
dc.contributor.author
Correa Haeussler, José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Feuilloley, Laurent
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pérez Lantero, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soto San Martín, José
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-08-12T15:07:13Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-08-12T15:07:13Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2015
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Discrete Comput Geom (2015) 53:344–365
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
1432-0444
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
DOI: 10.1007/s00454-014-9661-y
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/132632
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Given a set of n axis-parallel rectangles in the plane, finding a maximum
independent set (MIS), amaximumweighted independent set (WMIS), and aminimum
hitting set (MHS), are basic problems in computational geometry and combinatorics.
They have attracted significant attention since the sixties, when Wegner conjectured
that the duality gap, equal to the ratio between the size of MIS and the size of MHS,
is always bounded by a universal constant. An interesting case is when there exists a
diagonal line that intersects each of the given rectangles. Indeed, Chepoi and Felsner
recently gave a 6-approximation algorithm forMHSin this setting, and showed that the
duality gap is between 3/2 and 6.We consider the same setting and improve upon these results. First, we derive an O(n2)-time algorithm for the WMIS when, in addition,
every pair of intersecting rectangles have a common point below the diagonal. This
improves and extends a classic result of Lubiw, and gives a 2-approximation algorithm
for WMIS. Second, we show that MIS is NP-hard. Finally, we prove that the duality
gap is between 2 and 4. The upper bound, which implies a 4-approximation algorithm
for MHS, follows from simple combinatorial arguments, whereas the lower bound
represents the best known lower bound on the duality gap, even in the general setting
of the rectangles.
en_US
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Núcleo
Milenio Información y Coordinación en Redes ICM/FIC P10-024F; FONDECYT Grant 11110069 and FONDECYT Grant 11130266