Malignant melanoma in Chile: different site distribution between private and state patients
Author
dc.contributor.author
Zemelman Decarli, Viviana
Author
dc.contributor.author
Valenzuela, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sazunic Yáñez, Ivo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Araya Bertucci, María Irene
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2015-08-13T21:02:43Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2015-08-13T21:02:43Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2014
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Biological Research 2014, 47:34
en_US
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0716-9760
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/0717-6287-47-34
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/132730
General note
dc.description
Artículo de publicación ISI
en_US
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: The body site location of primary Malignant Melanoma (MM) has been correlated with prognosis and
survival. Ethnic, genetics, sun exposure factors are related to the anatomical distribution of MM. Low and high
socioeconomic strata in Chile differ in ethnic, genetic and cultural conditions. The purpose of this study was to
analyze the anatomical MM distribution in the Chilean population in both strata searching for differences due to
their ethno-genetic-cultural differences. Records of 1148 MM, 575cases from state hospitals (Low Socioeconomic
Strata, LSS) and 573 cases from private clinics (High Socioeconomic Strata, HSS) were analyzed by body site.
Results: Females from LSS showed a higher number of MM in soles, cheeks, and around the eye area. Females
from the HSS showed a higher number of MM in dorsal feet and dorsal hands. Males from LSS showed a higher
number of MM in soles, around the eye area, and cheeks. However, males from HSS showed a higher number of
MM in the trunk, and in the arms. Acral MM was significantly higher in LSS than in the HSS in both sexes. The
Chilean population from the HSS and LSS showed differences in the distribution of MM by site. Furthermore,
gender differences in the proportion of MM analyzed by anatomical site are observed in both strata.
Conclusions: Results show evidence that differential genetics factors, sun exposure, or other environmental or
cultural factors of both strata may account for these differences