Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorMendoza Inzunza, Laura 
Authordc.contributor.authorHorta, Paula 
Authordc.contributor.authorEspinoza, José 
Authordc.contributor.authorAguilera, Miguel 
Authordc.contributor.authorBalmaceda, Nicolás 
Authordc.contributor.authorCastro Lara, Ariel 
Authordc.contributor.authorRuiz Carmona, Mauricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorDíaz, Orlando 
Authordc.contributor.authorHopkinson, Nicholas 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-08-21T14:08:03Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-08-21T14:08:03Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEur Respir J 2015; 45: 347–354en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0903-1936
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1183/09031936.00084514
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/132988
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractPhysical inactivity is a cardinal feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Pedometers, which have been used in healthy populations, might also increase physical activity in patients with COPD. COPD patients taking part in a 3-month individualised programme to promote an increase in their daily physical activity were randomised to either a standard programme of physical activity encouragement alone, or a pedometer-based programme. Assessments were performed by investigators blinded to treatment allocation. Change in average 1-week daily step count, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council scale, St George’s respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and COPD assessment test (CAT) were compared between groups. 102 patients were recruited, of whom 97 completed the programme (pedometer group: n=50; control group: n=47); 60.8% were male with a mean±SD age of 68.7±8.5 years, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 66.1±19.4% and FEV1/forced vital capacity 55.2±9.5%. Both groups had comparable characteristics at baseline. The pedometer group had significantly greater improvements in: physical activity 3080±3254 steps·day−1 versus 138.3±1950 steps·day−1 (p<0.001); SGRQ −8.8±12.2 versus −3.8±10.9 ( p=0.01); CAT score −3.5±5.5 versus −0.6±6.6 (p=0.001); and 6MWD 12.4±34.6 versus −0.7±24.4m (p=0.02) than patients receiving activity encouragement only. A simple physical activity enhancement programme using pedometers can effectively improve physical activity level and quality of life in COPD patientsen_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFondo Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo en Salud (FONIS; Santiago, Chile) (project no. SA10i20022)en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherEUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALSen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Títulodc.titlePedometers to enhance physical activity in COPD: a randomised controlled trialen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile