Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorEl-Mallakh, Rif S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorVöhringer Cárdenas, Paul 
Authordc.contributor.authorOstacher, Michael M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBaldassano, Claudia F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorHoltzman, Niki S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorWhitham, Elizabeth A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorThommi, Sairah B. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGoodwin, Frederick K. 
Authordc.contributor.authorGhaemi, S. Nassir 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-10-14T18:36:30Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-10-14T18:36:30Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Affective Disorders184 (2015) 318–321en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.04.054
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/134371
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The use of antidepressants in rapid-cycling bipolar disorder has been controversial. We report the first randomized clinical trial with modern antidepressants on this topic. Methods: As part of the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study, we analyzed, as an a priori secondary outcome, rapid cycling as a predictor of response in 68 patients randomized to continue vs. discontinue antidepressant treatment, after initial response for an acute major depressive episode. Outcomes assessed were percent time well and total number of episodes. All patients received standard mood stabilizers. Results: In those continued on antidepressants (AD), rapid cycling (RC) subjects experienced 268% (3.14/1.17) more total mood episodes/year, and 293% (1.29/0.44) more depressive episodes/year, compared with non-rapid cycling (NRC) subjects (mean difference in depressive episodes per year RC vs. NRC was 0.85 +/- 0.37 (SE), df=28, p=0.03). In the AD continuation group, RC patients also had 28.8% less time in remission than NRC patients (95% confidence intervals (9.9%, 46.5%), p=0.004). No such differences between RC and NRC subjects were seen in the AD discontinuation group (Table 1). Analyses within the rapid-cycling subgroup alone were consistent with the above comparisons between RC and NRC subjects, stratified by maintenance antidepressant treatment, though limited by sample size. Conclusions: In an a priori analysis, despite preselection for good antidepressant response and concurrent mood stabilizer treatment, antidepressant continuation in rapid-cycling was associated with worsened maintenance outcomes, especially for depressive morbidity, vs. antidepressant discontinuation.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNIMH, United Statesen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectBipolar disorderen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectAntidepressantsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRapid cyclingen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectDepressionen_US
Títulodc.titleAntidepressants worsen rapid-cycling course in bipolar depression: A STEP-BD randomized clinical trialen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile