Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBalsara, Dinshaw S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMontecino, Gino 
Authordc.contributor.authorToro, Eleuterio 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-06-16T16:58:19Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-06-16T16:58:19Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Computational Physics 311 (2016) 1–21en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.01.029
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/138895
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn this paper we explore flux vector splittings for the MHD system of equations. Our approach follows the strategy that was initially put forward in Toro and Vazquez-Cendon (2012) [55]. We split the flux vector into an advected sub-system and a pressure subsystem. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the split sub-systems are then studied for physical suitability. Not all flux vector splittings for MHD yield physically meaningful results. We find one that is completely useless, another that is only marginally useful and one that should work well in all regimes where the MHD equations are used. Unfortunately, this successful flux vector splitting turns out to be different from the ZhaBilgen flux vector splitting. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of this favorable FVS are explored in great detail in this paper. The pressure sub-system holds the key to finding a successful flux vector splitting. The eigenstructure of the successful flux vector splitting for MHD is thoroughly explored and orthonormalized left and right eigenvectors are explicitly catalogued. We present a novel approachto the solution of the Riemann problem formed by the pressure sub-system for the MHD equations. Once the pressure sub-system is solved, the advection sub-system follows naturally. Our method also works very well for the Euler system. Our FVS successfully captures isolated, stationary contact discontinuities in MHD. However, we explain why any FVS for MHD is not adept at capturing isolated, stationary Alfvenic discontinuities. Several stringent one-dimensional Riemann problems are presented to show that the method works successfully and can effectively capture the full panoply of wave structures that arise in MHD. This includes compound waves and switch-on and switch-off shocks that arise because of the non-convex nature of the MHD system.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNSF NSF-ACI-1307369 NSF-DMS-1361197 NSF-ACI-1533850; NASA grant NASA-NNX 12A088Gen_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieren_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectRiemann solversen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectGodunov schemesen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectFlux vector splittingen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMagnetohydrodynamicsen_US
Títulodc.titleExploring various flux vector splittings for the magneto hydrodynamic systemen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile