Analysis of the Bayesian Cramer-Rao lower bound in astrometry Studying the impact of prior information in the location of an object
Author
dc.contributor.author
Echeverría Solis, Alex
Author
dc.contributor.author
Silva Sánchez, Jorge
Author
dc.contributor.author
Méndez Bussard, René Alejandro
Author
dc.contributor.author
Orchard Concha, Marcos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2016-11-17T15:27:37Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2016-11-17T15:27:37Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2016
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
A&A 594, A111 (2016)
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1051/0004-6361/201628220
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/141241
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Context. The best precision that can be achieved to estimate the location of a stellar-like object is a topic of permanent interest in the
astrometric community.
Aims. We analyze bounds for the best position estimation of a stellar-like object on a CCD detector array in a Bayesian setting where
the position is unknown, but where we have access to a prior distribution. In contrast to a parametric setting where we estimate a parameter
from observations, the Bayesian approach estimates a random object (i.e., the position is a random variable) from observations
that are statistically dependent on the position.
Methods. We characterize the Bayesian Cramér-Rao (CR) that bounds the minimum mean square error (MMSE) of the best estimator
of the position of a point source on a linear CCD-like detector, as a function of the properties of detector, the source, and the
background.
Results. We quantify and analyze the increase in astrometric performance from the use of a prior distribution of the object position,
which is not available in the classical parametric setting. This gain is shown to be significant for various observational regimes, in
particular in the case of faint objects or when the observations are taken under poor conditions. Furthermore, we present numerical
evidence that the MMSE estimator of this problem tightly achieves the Bayesian CR bound. This is a remarkable result, demonstrating
that all the performance gains presented in our analysis can be achieved with the MMSE estimator.
Conclusions. The Bayesian CR bound can be used as a benchmark indicator of the expected maximum positional precision of a set of
astrometric measurements in which prior information can be incorporated. This bound can be achieved through the conditional mean
estimator, in contrast to the parametric case where no unbiased estimator precisely reaches the CR bound.