Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorLoncomilla, Patricio 
Authordc.contributor.authorRuiz del Solar, Javier 
Authordc.contributor.authorMartínez, Luz 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T20:40:48Z
Available datedc.date.available2017-03-01T20:40:48Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationPattern Recognition. Volumen: 60 Páginas: 499-514es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.021
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/142893
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe main goal of this survey is to present a complete analysis of object recognition methods based on local invariant features from a robotics perspective; a summary which can be used by developers of robot vision applications in the selection and development of object recognition systems. The survey includes a brief description of the main approaches reported in the literature, with more specific analyses of local interest point computation methods, local descriptor computation and matching methods, and geometric verification methods. Different methods are analyzed by considering the main requirements of robotics applications, such as real-time operation with limited on-board computational resources, and constrained observational conditions derived from the robot geometry (e.g. limited camera resolution). In addition, various object recognition systems are evaluated in a service-robot domestic environment, where the final task to be performed by a service robot is the manipulation of objects. It can be concluded from the results reported that (i) the most suitable keypoint detectors are ORB, BRISK, Fast Hessian, and DoG, (ii) the most suitable descriptors are ORB, BRISK, SIFE, and SURF, (iii) the final performance of object recognition systems using local invariant features under real-world conditions depends strongly on the geometric verification methods being used, and (iv) the best performing object recognition systems are built using ORB-ORB and DoG-SIFT keypoint-descriptor combinations. ORB-ORB based systems are faster, while DoG-SIFT are more robust to real-world conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourcePattern Recognitiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLocal interest pointses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLocal descriptorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectObject recognitiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLocal invariant featureses_ES
Títulodc.titleObject recognition using local invariant features for robotic applications: A surveyes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorC. R. B.es_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile