Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorBarnhart, William D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMurray, Jessica 
Authordc.contributor.authorBriggs, Richard 
Authordc.contributor.authorGómez, Francisco 
Authordc.contributor.authorMiles, Charles 
Authordc.contributor.authorSvarc, Jerry 
Authordc.contributor.authorRiquelme Muñoz, Sebastián 
Authordc.contributor.authorStressler, Bryan 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T19:00:36Z
Available datedc.date.available2017-04-03T19:00:36Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJ. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 121, 6172–6191es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1002/2016JB013124
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/143438
Abstractdc.description.abstractGreat subduction earthquakes are thought to rupture portions of the megathrust, where interseismic coupling is high and velocity-weakening frictional behavior is dominant, releasing elastic deformation accrued over a seismic cycle. Conversely, postseismic afterslip is assumed to occur primarily in regions of velocity-strengthening frictional characteristics that may correlate with lower interseismic coupling. However, it remains unclear if fixed frictional properties of the subduction interface, coseismic or aftershock-induced stress redistribution, or other factors control the spatial distribution of afterslip. Here we use interferometric synthetic aperture radar and Global Position System observations to map the distribution of coseismic slip of the 2015 M-w 8.3 Illapel, Chile, earthquake and afterslip within the first 38days following the earthquake. We find that afterslip overlaps the coseismic slip area and propagates along-strike into regions of both high and moderate interseismic coupling. The significance of these observations, however, is tempered by the limited resolution of geodetic inversions for both slip and coupling. Additional afterslip imaged deeper on the fault surface bounds a discrete region of deep coseismic slip, and both contribute to net uplift of the Chilean Coastal Cordillera. A simple partitioning of the subduction interface into regions of fixed frictional properties cannot reconcile our geodetic observations. Instead, stress heterogeneities, either preexisting or induced by the earthquake, likely provide the primary control on the afterslip distribution for this subduction zone earthquake. We also explore the occurrence of coseismic and postseismic coastal uplift in this sequence and its implications for recent hypotheses concerning the source of permanent coastal uplift along subduction zoneses_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Uniones_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAfterslipes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectIllapel earthquakees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectInSARes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectRate and state frictiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCoastal upliftes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMegathrust earthquakees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAsperity modelses_ES
Títulodc.titleCoseismic slip and early afterslip of the 2015 Illapel, Chile, earthquake: Implications for frictional heterogeneity and coastal upliftes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapces_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile