Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCandia, Gabriel 
Authordc.contributor.authorDe Pascale, Gregory 
Authordc.contributor.authorMontalva, Gonzalo 
Authordc.contributor.authorLedezma, Christian 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T21:01:38Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-05-16T21:01:38Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEarthquake Spectra, Vol. 33(2):709–728, May 2017es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1193/031716EQS043M
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/147823
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe 2015 Illapel earthquake sequence in Central Chile, occurred along the subduction zone interface in a known seismic gap, with moment magnitudes of M-w 8.3, M-w 7.1, and M-w 7.6. The Main event triggered tsunami waves that damaged structures along the coast, while the surface ground motion induced localized liquefaction, settlement of bridge abutments, rockfall, debris flow, and collapse in several adobe structures. Because of the strict seismic codes in Chile, damage to modern engineered infrastructure was limited, although there was widespread tsunami-induced damage to one-story and two-stories residential homes adjacent to the shoreline. Soon after the earthquake, shear wave measurements were performed at selected potentially liquefiable sites to test recent Vs-based liquefaction susceptibility approaches. This paper describes the effects that this earthquake sequence and tsunami had on a number of retaining structures, bridge abutments, and cuts along Chile's main highway (Route 5). Since tsunami waves redistribute coastal and near shore sand along the coast, liquefaction evidence in coastal zones with tsunami waves is sometimes obscured within minutes because the tsunami waves entrain and deposit sand that covers or erodes evidence of liquefaction (e.g., lateral spread or sand blows). This suggests that liquefaction occurrence and hazard may be under estimated in coastal zones. Importantly, the areas that experienced the greatest coseismic slip, appeared to have the largest volumes of rockfall that impacted roads, which suggests that coseismic slip maps, generated immediately after the shaking stops, can provide a first order indication about where to expect damage during future major events.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNational Research Center for Integrated Natural Disaster Management, CONICYT/FONDAP/15110017 / Universidad del Desarrollo / FCFM (UChile) academic fund / CEGA FONDAP CONICYT, 15090013 / FONDECYT, 1140317, 11110125 / Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining, CONICYT/FONDAP/15130015 CONICYT USA, 2012-0007 / U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), CMMI-1266418 / Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Steering Committeees_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherEarthquake Engineering Research Institutees_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceEarthquake Spectraes_ES
Títulodc.titleGeotechnical Aspects of the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel Megathrust Earthquake Sequence in Chilees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadortjnes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile