Reliability of age estimation from iliac auricular surface in a subactual Chilean sample
Author
dc.contributor.author
Herrera, María José
Author
dc.contributor.author
Retamal Yermani, Rodrigo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-05-23T19:33:38Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-05-23T19:33:38Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2017
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Forensic Science International 275 (2017) 317.e1–317.e4
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.01.029
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/148081
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The aim of this study was to test the reliability of Osborne et al. (2004) [8] age estimation based on the
iliac auricular surface of the ilium. We selected 172 skeletons with documented sex and age-at-death and
established six uniformly distributed age intervals for analysis. ANOVA was employed to assess the
association of the documented age with sex and the auricular surface classification. We employed
Bonferroni post-hoc tests to
find any statistical differences across documented ages within each phase of
Osborne's criteria. While the ANOVA showed a significant association between the documented age and
the auricular surface classification, post-hoc tests found that phases 2 and 3 were the only consecutive
phases with significant differences. We argue that a lack of statistical significance between consecutive
phases undermines the reliability of this method for forensic purposes especially in middle adults. It may
be possible that the collapse of intermediate phases would increase the accuracy of this method.