An intercomparison of approaches for improving operational seasonal streamflow forecasts
Author
dc.contributor.author
Mendoza, Pablo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wood, Andrew W.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Clark, Elizabeth
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rothwell, Eric
Author
dc.contributor.author
Clark, Martyn P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Nijssen, Bart
Author
dc.contributor.author
Brekke, Levi D.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Arnold, Jeffrey R.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-06-19T20:55:58Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-06-19T20:55:58Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2017
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 3915–3935, 2017
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3915-2017
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/149016
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
For much of the last century, forecasting centers
around the world have offered seasonal streamflow predictions
to support water management. Recent work suggests
that the two major avenues to advance seasonal predictability
are improvements in the estimation of initial hydrologic
conditions (IHCs) and the incorporation of climate information.
This study investigates the marginal benefits of a variety
of methods using IHCs and/or climate information, focusing
on seasonal water supply forecasts (WSFs) in five case study
watersheds located in the US Pacific Northwest region. We
specify two benchmark methods that mimic standard operational
approaches – statistical regression against IHCs and
model-based ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) – and
then systematically intercompare WSFs across a range of
lead times. Additional methods include (i) statistical techniques
using climate information either from standard indices
or from climate reanalysis variables and (ii) several
hybrid/hierarchical approaches harnessing both land surface
and climate predictability. In basins where atmospheric teleconnection
signals are strong, and when watershed predictability
is low, climate information alone provides considerable
improvements. For those basins showing weak teleconnections,
custom predictors from reanalysis fields were
more effective in forecast skill than standard climate indices.
ESP predictions tended to have high correlation skill but
greater bias compared to other methods, and climate predictors
failed to substantially improve these deficiencies within
a trace weighting framework. Lower complexity techniques
were competitive with more complex methods, and the hierarchical
expert regression approach introduced here (hierarchical
ensemble streamflow prediction – HESP) provided a
robust alternative for skillful and reliable water supply forecasts
at all initialization times. Three key findings from this
effort are (1) objective approaches supporting methodologically
consistent hindcasts open the door to a broad range of
beneficial forecasting strategies; (2) the use of climate predictors
can add to the seasonal forecast skill available from
IHCs; and (3) sample size limitations must be handled rigorously
to avoid over-trained forecast solutions. Overall, the results
suggest that despite a rich, long heritage of operational
use, there remain a number of compelling opportunities to
improve the skill and value of seasonal streamflow predictions.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
US Army Corps of Engineers and through a cooperative
agreement with the US Bureau of Reclamation