The test case of HD 26965: difficulties disentangling weak doppler signals from stellar activity
Author
dc.contributor.author
Díaz, Matias R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jenkins, James Stewart
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tuomi, Mikko
Author
dc.contributor.author
Butler, R. Paul
Author
dc.contributor.author
Soto, Maritza G.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Teske, Johanna K.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Feng, Fabo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Shectman, Stephen A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Arriagada, Pamela
Author
dc.contributor.author
Crane, Jeffrey D.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Thompson, Ian B.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Vogt, Steven S.
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-08-01T16:08:09Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-08-01T16:08:09Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
The Astronomical Journal, 155:126 (14pp), 2018
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.3847/1538-3881/aaa896
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150516
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
We report the discovery of a radial velocity signal that can be interpreted as a planetary-mass candidate orbiting the K dwarf HD 26965, with an orbital period of 42.364 +/- 0.015 days, or alternatively, as the presence of residual, uncorrected rotational activity in the data. Observations include data from HIRES, PFS, CHIRON, and HARPS, where 1111 measurements were made over 16 years. Our best solution for HD 26965 b is consistent with a super-Earth that has a minimum mass of 6.92 +/- 0.79 M-circle plus orbiting at a distance of 0.215 +/- 0.008 au from its host star. We have analyzed the correlation between spectral activity indicators and the radial velocities from each instrument, showing moderate correlations that we include in our model. From this analysis, we recover a similar to 38-day signal, which matches some literature values of the stellar rotation period. However, from independent Mt. Wilson HK data for this star, we find evidence for a significant 42-day signal after subtraction of longer period magnetic cycles, casting doubt on the planetary hypothesis for this period. Although our statistical model strongly suggests that the 42-day signal is Doppler in origin, we conclude that the residual effects of stellar rotation are difficult to fully model and remove from this data set, highlighting the difficulties to disentangle small planetary signals and photospheric noise, particularly when the orbital periods are close to the rotation period of the star. This study serves as an excellent test case for future works that aim to detect small planets orbiting "Sun-like" stars using radial velocity measurements.