Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAlvear A., Jorge 
Authordc.contributor.authorArtaza Barros, Carmen 
Authordc.contributor.authorVial P., María Teresa 
Authordc.contributor.authorGuerrero, S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMuzzo Benavides, Santiago 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-12-20T14:52:35Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-12-20T14:52:35Z
Publication datedc.date.issued1986
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationArchives of Disease in Childhood, Volumen 61, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 257-262
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00039888
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1136/adc.61.3.257
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/157132
Abstractdc.description.abstractEarly postnatal malnutrition produces delay in growth and developmental processes, and children from a low socioeconomical level where undernutrition is prevalent are shorter than those from higher socioeconomic levels. We examined the effects of severe and early protein energy malnutrition on growth and bone maturation. We studied 40 preschool children who had been admitted to hospital in infancy with protein energy malnutrition and 38 children from the same socioeconomic level, paired for age and sex, who had never been malnourished. Growth measurements were made over a period of 4-6 years, and bone age was determined in a subgroup through wrist roentgenograms. Results showed a correlation between protein energy malnutrition, birth weight of infants, and mother's height and head circumference. The group with protein energy malnutrition showed a significant delay in stature after four years, especially the girls (p < 0.001). Weight:height ratio was reduced in boys compared with controls but not in girls. Both groups showed a delay in bone maturation, but there were no significant differences between them. We found a positive correlation between bone age and arm fat area in control boys and between bone age and height for age in boys with protein energy malnutrition. The finding that rehabilitated children were shorter than the control group but had similar bone age at follow up suggests that genetic or prenatal factors were important in their later poor growth, and this suggestion is supported by their smaller birth size and the smaller size of their mothers
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Sourcedc.sourceArchives of Disease in Childhood
Keywordsdc.subjectPediatrics
Keywordsdc.subjectPerinatology
Keywordsdc.subjectChild Health
Títulodc.titlePhysical growth and bone age of survivors of protein energy malnutrition
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorapc
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record