Genetic diversity of Bovine Viral
Diarrhea Virus from cattle in Chile
between 2003 and 2007
Author
dc.contributor.author
Donoso, Astrid
Author
dc.contributor.author
Inostroza, Felipe
Author
dc.contributor.author
Celedón, María
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pizarro Lucero, José
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-12-20T14:53:43Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-12-20T14:53:43Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2018
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
BMC Veterinary Research (2018) 14:314
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
17466148
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1186/s12917-018-1641-7
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/157378
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Background: Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus causes significant economic losses in cattle. BVDV has high genomic
diversity, with two species, BVDV-1 and BVDV-2, and at least twenty-one subgenotypes for BVDV-1 and four
subgenotypes for BVDV-2. Vaccines are important tools to reduce the economic losses caused by this virus.
However, vaccine strains must correspond to the antigenic profile of the viruses present in the region where the
vaccine is applied. A restricted phylogenetic study with 14 viruses isolated from cattle between 1993 and 2001
showed that the genetic profile of BVDV in Chile consisted of viruses of both species and sub-genotypes 1a, 1b, 1c
(currently 1j) and 2a. To determine more accurately the genetic profile of BVDV in Chile, in this study a larger
number of viruses obtained from bovines between 2003 and 2007 were typed.
Results: The study was performed using partial sequences from the 5′ noncoding region (5’UTR) and E2 coding
region of the viral genome of thirty-five Chilean viruses isolated from geographic regions that have 84.6% of
the Chilean cattle. All tested viruses belonged to species BVDV-1. Eighteen viruses belonged to BVDV-1j
subgenotype (51.4%), twelve belonged to BVDV-1b (34.3%) and five belonged to BVDV-1a (14.3%). The Chilean
BVDV-1j viruses showed low genetic diversity, both among themselves and with the BVDV-1j present in other
regions of the world. This could be explained by a relatively recent introduction of this viral subgenotype in
cattle, which agrees with its low geographical distribution worldwide. Otherwise, Chilean BVDV-1b viruses
grouped into a single cluster, different even than the viruses present in Argentina and Brazil, countries
geographically close to Chile, a process of local evolution that could generate antigenic differences between
the Chilean viruses and the viruses used as vaccine strains.
Conclusions: The high presence of viruses of the BVDV-1j subgenotype, which show major antigenic
differences with BVDV-1a and BVDV-1b subgenotypes used in the commercial vaccines, suggest that BVDV-1j
viruses could be an emergent subgenotype of BVDV in cattle in South America and suggest evaluating an
update of the vaccines used in Chile.