Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorSilva-Illanes, Nicolas 
Authordc.contributor.authorEspinoza, Manuel 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-05-31T15:19:14Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-05-31T15:19:14Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationValue in Health, Volumen 21, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 858-873
Identifierdc.identifier.issn15244733
Identifierdc.identifier.issn10983015
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.010
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169358
Abstractdc.description.abstractBackground: The economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening is challenging because of the need to model the underlying unobservable natural history of the disease. Objectives: To describe the available Markov models and to critically analyze their main structural assumptions. Methods: A systematic search was performed in eight relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Econlit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Economic Evaluations Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Cost-Effective Analysis Registry, and European Network of Health Economics Evaluation Databases), identifying 34 models that met the inclusion criteria. A comparative analysis of model structure and parameterization was conducted using two checklists and guidelines for cost-effectiveness screening models. Results: Two modeling techniques were identified. One strategy used a Markov model to reproduce the natural history of the disease and an overlaying model that reproduced the screening process, whereas the other used a single model to represent a screening program. Most of the studies included only adenoma-carcinoma sequences, a few included de novo cancer, and none included the serrated pathway. Parameterization of adenoma dwell time, sojourn time, and surveillance differed between studies, and there was a lack of validation and statistical calibration against local epidemiological data. Most of the studies analyzed failed to perform an adequate literature review and synthesis of diagnostic accuracy properties of the screening tests modeled. Conclusions: Several strategies to model colorectal cancer screening have been developed, but many challenges remain to adequately represent the natural history of the disease and the screening process. Structural uncertainty analysis could be a useful strategy for understanding the impact of the assumptions of different models on cost-effectiveness results.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier Ltd
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceValue in Health
Keywordsdc.subjectcolorectal cancer
Keywordsdc.subjecteconomic evaluation
Keywordsdc.subjectMarkov models
Keywordsdc.subjectscreening
Keywordsdc.subjectstructural uncertainty
Títulodc.titleCritical Analysis of Markov Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorjmm
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile