Teacher training, mentoring or performance support systems?
Author
dc.contributor.author
Araya, Roberto
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-05-31T15:33:53Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-05-31T15:33:53Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2019
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Volumen 785, 2019, Pages 306-315
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
21945357
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/978-3-319-93882-0_30
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/169660
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
A major challenge in education is how to improve teaching. This means improving teaching so that all students effectively achieve the levels of performance stipulated in the curriculum and that they do so within the specified timeframes. This goal is particularly difficult to achieve in schools with students of low socioeconomic status. However, measuring the quality of instruction is not a straightforward task. This is partly due to a lack of rigorous and regular data on student performance gathered by independent third parties. On the other hand, there are several alternatives for improving teaching: teacher training, teacher mentoring programs and support systems to boost teacher performance. Our study looks at eight years of data on national standardized test scores for every school in a low SES district. We found that the effect size of a Performance Support System is larger than the benchmark effect sizes for teacher training and teacher mentoring programs.