Assessing the ability of image based point clouds captured from a UAV to measure the terrain in the presence of canopy cover
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wallace, Luke
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bellman, Chris
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hally, Bryan
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hernandez, Jaime
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jones, Simon
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hillman, Samuel
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2019-10-22T03:13:56Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2019-10-22T03:13:56Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2019
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Forests, Volumen 10, Issue 3, 2019,
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
19994907
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.3390/f10030284
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/172022
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Point clouds captured from Unmanned Aerial Systems are increasingly relied upon to provide information describing the structure of forests. The quality of the information derived from these point clouds is dependent on a range of variables, including the type and structure of the forest, weather conditions and flying parameters. A key requirement to achieve accurate estimates of height based metrics describing forest structure is a source of ground information. This study explores the availability and reliability of ground surface points available within point clouds captured in six forests of different structure (canopy cover and height), using three image capture and processing strategies, consisting of nadir, oblique and composite nadir/oblique image networks. The ground information was extracted through manual segmentation of the point clouds as well as through the use of two commonly used ground filters, LAStools lasground and the Cloth Simulation Filter. The outcomes of these strategies were assessed against ground control captured with a Total Station. Results indicate that a small increase in the number of ground points captured (between 0 and 5% of a 10 m radius plot) can be achieved through the use of a composite image network. In the case of manually identified ground points, this reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) error of the terrain model by between 1 and 11 cm, with greater reductions seen in plots with high canopy cover. The ground filters trialled were not able to exploit the extra information in the point clouds and inconsistent results in terrain RMSE were obtained across the various plots and imaging network configurations. The use of a composite network also provided greater penetration into the canopy, which is likely to improve the representation of mid-canopy elements.