Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCastillo, Juan C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorTorres, Alex 
Authordc.contributor.authorAtria, Jorge 
Authordc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Luis 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-10-22T03:14:00Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-10-22T03:14:00Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2019
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationRevista Internacional de Sociología RIS vol. 77 (1), e117, enero-marzo, 2019
Identifierdc.identifier.issn1988429X
Identifierdc.identifier.issn00349712
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3989/ris.2019.77.1.17.114
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/172042
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe idea of meritocracy is related to the distribution of goods and rewards based on individual talent and effort, being a principle that legitimizes the unequal distribution of resources in modern societies. Despite the constant references to meritocracy in inequality and stratification research, there are still few conceptual and empirical attempts to understand to what extent individuals perceive and prefer meritocracy, as well as their consequences. The present research proposes a conceptual and empirical framework for studying meritocratic perceptions and preferences, which is then related with economic inequality variables. Using data from the Chilean survey “Social justice and citizenship participation” (N= 1,245), the analyses suggest that meritocratic perceptions and preferences are different constructs and that those perceiving an adequate functioning of meritocracy also perceive less economic inequality.
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe idea of meritocracy is related to the distribution of goods and rewards based on individual talent and effort, being a principle that legitimizes the unequal distribution of resources in modern societies. Despite the constant references to meritocracy in inequality and stratification research, there are still few conceptual and empirical attempts to understand to what extent individuals perceive and prefer meritocracy, as well as their consequences. The present research proposes a conceptual and empirical framework for studying meritocratic perceptions and preferences, which is then related with economic inequality variables. Using data from the Chilean survey “Social justice and citizenship participation” (N= 1,245), the analyses suggest that meritocratic perceptions and preferences are different constructs and that those perceiving an adequate functioning of meritocracy also perceive less economic inequality.
Lenguagedc.language.isosp
Publisherdc.publisherCSIC Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientifícas
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceRevista Internacional de Sociología
Keywordsdc.subjectDistributive justice
Keywordsdc.subjectEconomic inequality
Keywordsdc.subjectInequality perception
Keywordsdc.subjectMeritocracy
Keywordsdc.subjectSocial status
Títulodc.titleMeritocracia y desigualdad económica: percepciones, preferencias e implicancias
Title in another languagedc.title.alternativeMeritocracy and economic inequality: perceptions, preferences and implications
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile