Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCartes, C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez, D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSalinas, D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSegovia, C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorAhumada, C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPérez, N. 
Authordc.contributor.authorValenzuela F., Manuel A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLanza, N. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Solís, R. O. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPerez, V. L. 
Authordc.contributor.authorZegers, P. 
Authordc.contributor.authorFuentes, A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorAlarcón, C. 
Authordc.contributor.authorTraipe, L. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-10-30T15:40:07Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-10-30T15:40:07Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2019
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationArchivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia, Volumen 94, Issue 7, 2019, Pages 337-342
Identifierdc.identifier.issn03656691
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.oftal.2019.03.007
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/172539
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: Because of high variability, tear film osmolarity measures have been questioned in dry eye assessment. Understanding the origin of such variability would aid data interpretation. This study aims to evaluate osmolarity variability in a clinical setting. Material and methods: Twenty dry eyes and 20 control patients were evaluated. Three consecutive osmolarity measurements per eye at 5 min intervals were obtained. Variability was represented by the difference between both extreme readings per eye. Machine learning techniques were used to quantify discrimination capacity of tear osmolarity for dry eye. Results: Mean osmolarities in the control and dry eye groups were 295.1 ± 7.3 mOsm/L and 300.6 ± 11.2 mOsm/L, respectively (P = .004). Osmolarity variabilities were 7.5 ± 3.6 mOsm/L and 16.7 ± 11.9 mOsm/L, for the control and dry eye groups, respectively (P < .001). Based on osmolarity, a logistic classifier showed an 85% classification accuracy. Conclusions: In the clinical setting, both mean osmolarity and osmolarity variability in the dry eye group were significantly higher than in the control group. Machine learning techniques showed good classification accuracy. It is concluded that higher variability of tear osmolarity is a dry eye feature.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier Ltd
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceArchivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia
Keywordsdc.subjectDry eye
Keywordsdc.subjectMachine learning
Keywordsdc.subjectOsmolarity
Keywordsdc.subjectVariability
Títulodc.titleDry eye is matched by increased intrasubject variability in tear osmolarity as confirmed by machine learning approach El ojo seco está relacionado con un aumento intrasujeto de la variabilidad de osmolaridad lagrimal confirmado por tecnología de aprendiza
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorSCOPUS
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile