A progressive hedging approach to solve harvest scheduling problem under climate change
Author
dc.contributor.author
García Gonzalo, Jordi
Author
dc.contributor.author
País Martínez, Cristóbal
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bachmatiuk, Joanna
Author
dc.contributor.author
Barreiro, Susana
Author
dc.contributor.author
Weintraub Pohorille, Andrés
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2020-04-28T00:03:44Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2020-04-28T00:03:44Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Forests 2020, 11, 224
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.3390/f11020224
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/174177
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Due to the long time horizon typically characterizing forest planning, uncertainty plays an important role when developing forest management plans. Especially important is the uncertainty related to recently human-induced global warming since it has a clear impact on forest capacity to contribute to biogenic and anthropogenic ecosystem services. If the forest manager ignores uncertainty, the resulting forest management plan may be sub-optimal, in the best case. This paper presents a methodology to incorporate uncertainty due to climate change into forest management planning. Specifically, this paper addresses the problem of harvest planning, i.e., defining which stands are to be cut in each planning period in order to maximize expected net revenues, considering several climate change scenarios. This study develops a solution approach for a planning problem for a eucalyptus forest with 1000 stands located in central Portugal where expected future conditions are anticipated by considering a set of climate scenarios. The model including all the constraints that link all the scenarios and spatial adjacency constraints leads to a very large problem that can only be solved by decomposing it into scenarios. For this purpose, we solve the problem using Progressive Hedging (PH) algorithm, which decomposes the problem into scenario sub-problems easier to solve. To analyze the performance of PH versus the use of the extensive form (EF), we solve several instances of the original problem using both approaches. Results show that PH outperforms the EF in both solving time and final optimality gap. In addition, the use of PH allows to solve the most difficult problems while the commercial solvers are not able to solve the EF. The approach presented allows the planner to develop more robust management plans that incorporate the uncertainty due to climate change in their plans.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Models and Decision Support Systems for Addressing Risk and Uncertainty in Forest Planning - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT-Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia)
PTDC/AGR-FOR/4526/2012
European Union (EU)
2013-2019/001-001-EMMC
691149
MINECO
RYC-2013-14262
CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya
Complex Engineering Systems Institute (CONICIT)
PIA/BASAL AFB 180003
Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT)
CONICYT FONDECYT
1191531
supercomputing infrastructure of the NLHPC
ECM-02