Thoracoscopic approach for complications after esophageal atresia repair: initial experience
Author
dc.contributor.author
Cano Novillo, Indalecio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Aneiros Castro, Belén
Author
dc.contributor.author
Godoy Lenz, Jorge
Author
dc.contributor.author
Puentes Rivera, María Consuela
Author
dc.contributor.author
García Vázquez, Araceli
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moreno Zegarra, Cecilia
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2020-05-28T16:28:22Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2020-05-28T16:28:22Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020;13:147–151.
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1111/ases.12714
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/175056
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Introduction Improvements in technology and health care have helped reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with esophageal atresia. However, postoperative complications such as dehiscences, strictures, and recurrent fistulas still occur in a large percentage of patients. Here, we present our initial experience using the thoracoscopic approach for complications after esophageal atresia repair. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who developed complications after esophageal atresia repair and underwent thoracoscopic reoperation at two centers. Anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, and recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula were assessed as complications after esophageal atresia repair. Results We reoperated on four patients (range of age 3 days - 2 years) by thoracoscopy. Two patients who had undergone thoracoscopic atresia repair presented with anastomotic dehiscence. The anastomoses were thoracoscopically reconstructed without tension. One patient had undergone thoracoscopic atresia repair presented with esophageal stricture refractory to endoscopic dilatations. Thoracoscopic esophagoesophagostomy was performed in this 2-year-old patient. One patient who had undergone esophageal atresia repair and tracheoesophageal fistula closure by thoracotomy presented with a recurrent fistula at 1 year of age. The patient underwent thoracoscopic fistula closure with a 5-mm endostapler. All patients remain asymptomatic after reoperation. Conclusions Reoperation after esophageal atresia repair is challenging and carries a relatively high risk of developing complications. Compared to conventional surgery, the thoracoscopic approach in experienced hands offers better visualization and more accurate dissection and drainage of the thoracic cavity. Therefore, we want to encourage the use of thoracoscopy in the treatment of complications after esophageal atresia repair.