Consolidated framework for advancing implementation science for the implementation process and adherence assessment of a non‐pharmacological delirium prevention program
Author
dc.contributor.author
Garrido Montenegro, Maricel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Álvarez Espinoza, Evelyn
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ponce, Daniela P.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Salech Morales, Felipe
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tobar, Daniel I.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tobar Almonacid, Eduardo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-25T13:17:56Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-01-25T13:17:56Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;1–12
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1002/gps.5425
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178304
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objective To evaluate the contribution of applying the theoretical framework of implementation science for adherence to non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium. Methods A quasi-experimental prospective design was conducted from March 2017 to October 2018 in a teaching hospital. Participants included 149 healthcare staff and 72 elderly inpatients. A non-pharmacological delirium prevention program was designed, applied and evaluated in accordance with the consolidated framework for advancing implementation research (CFIR). The primary outcome was the global adherence rate to 12 predefined indicators, comparing measurements at baseline (O1), after training (O2) and at a 6-month follow-up (O3) assessed by an external reviewer. Staff knowledge and beliefs about delirium were assessed using a validated tool, and delirium incidence was evaluated using the confusion assessment method. Results Overall adherence increased from 58.2% (O1) to 77.9% (O2) and 75.6% (O3) (O2 vs. O1:p< 0.001 and O3 vs. O1:p< 0.001). Staff perceptions regarding implementation of non-pharmacological interventions increased from 74.8% to 81.9% (p= 0.004). Delirium incidence was non-significantly reduced from 20% (O1) to 16% (O3) (p= 0.99). Conclusions Implementation of a delirium prevention program using a CFIR model was useful in improving adherence to activities included in this program, as well as improving the knowledge and beliefs regarding delirium by healthcare workers. The impact of this implementation strategy on the incidence of delirium should be evaluated in a larger scale multicenter trial.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID) Chile
FONDEF ID16AM0080
Consolidated framework for advancing implementation science for the implementation process and adherence assessment of a non‐pharmacological delirium prevention program