Ejaculation‑sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES‑ThuLEP): outcomes on a large cohort
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bozzini, Giorgio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Berti, Lorenzo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Maltagliati, Matteo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Besana, Umberto
Author
dc.contributor.author
Calori, Alberto
Author
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Alexander
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sighinolfi, Maria Chiara
Author
dc.contributor.author
Micali, Salvatore
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pastore, Antonio Luigi
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ledezma Rojas, Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Broggini, Paolo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Rocco, Bernardo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Buizza, Carlo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-01-25T22:40:14Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-01-25T22:40:14Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
World Journal of Urology Sep 2020
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s00345-020-03442-2
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/178328
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Purpose To assess the effects of a new ejaculation-sparing thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ES-ThuLEP) technique on sexual functions and micturition, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to evaluate how the surgical technique of ES-ThuLEP can lead to ejaculation preservation. Methods A prospective study was carried out between January 2015 and January 2018 on patients with surgical indication for BPH, who wished to preserve ejaculation. The patients were treated with ES-ThuLEP and were evaluated before and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Three validated questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTSsex, IIEF-5 and IPSS) were used to assess changes in ejaculation, erectile function and urinary symptoms. Uroflowmetry (Qmax and Qavg), post-void residual volume and voided volume were also evaluated, to assess micturition improvement. Patients with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed with the Student'sttest, Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. Results Two hundred and eighty three patients were enrolled. Ejaculation was spared in 203 and 219 patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. No significant differences were observed between erectile function before and after surgery: baseline IIEF-5 = 16.2 +/- 4.47 vs 16.7 +/- 2.9 (p = 0.419) and 17.7 +/- 3.2 (p = 0.410) at 3 and 6 months. Significant improvement in urinary symptoms was achieved: baseline IPSS = 19.4 +/- 7.24 vs 5.8 +/- 4.3 (p = 0.032) and 3.9 +/- 4.1 (p = 0.029) at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion ES-ThuLEP effectively preserved ejaculation in over two thirds of the patients without compromising micturition improvement or erectile function. ES-ThuLEP could be a valid treatment option for BPH in young and sexually active men.