Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorTobar Reyes, Julio Cesar
Authordc.contributor.authorAndueza Castro, Luis
Authordc.contributor.authorJiménez Silva, Antonio
Authordc.contributor.authorBustamante Plaza, Roger Abdón
Authordc.contributor.authorCarvajal Herrera, Juan Carlos
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2021-11-15T19:33:23Z
Available datedc.date.available2021-11-15T19:33:23Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationClin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7:581–590es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1002/cre2.365
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182698
Abstractdc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt-Chrome (CoCr) superstructures. Material and methods: A model of tridimensional half-edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Two standard and one zygomatic implants were connected to a superstructure with an elliptic section of 6x 3 mm (mm). Two study models were established. Model A: Titanium (Ti) alloy superstructure; Model B: Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr) alloy superstructure. To simulate an immediate-loading situation, a friction coefficient of 0.71 was applied between the implant and the bone surface. An axial load of 252.04 [N] was applied on standard and zygomatic implants. Results: The Micromotion of dental implants was similar in both superstructure situations. The amount of micromotion was slightly higher in B1 and B3 models (Co-Cr alloy-superstructure) compared with A1 and A3 models (Titanium alloy superstructure). The micromotion values in two groups were greater than 150 mu m in the incisive region (standard implant) and molar region (zygomatic). In general, the micromotion was higher on the implant that received the load with respect to the other implants. The greater difference was observed when the load was applied on the standard implant A1 (Model A1 = 189.12 mu m) compared with standard implant B1(Model B1 = 263.25 mu m). Conclusions: Within the limits of present study, all implants on different load application points showed micromotion; in general, the amount of micromotion was slightly higher in the implants connected with Co-Cr alloy superstructure.es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWileyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceClinical and Experimental Dental Researches_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDental implantses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFinite element analysises_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMotiones_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectOsseointegrationes_ES
Títulodc.titleMicromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysises_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States