Micromotion analysis of immediately loaded implants with Titanium and Cobalt-Chrome superstructures. 3D finite element analysis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Tobar Reyes, Julio Cesar
Author
dc.contributor.author
Andueza Castro, Luis
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez Silva, Antonio
Author
dc.contributor.author
Bustamante Plaza, Roger Abdón
Author
dc.contributor.author
Carvajal Herrera, Juan Carlos
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2021-11-15T19:33:23Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2021-11-15T19:33:23Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021;7:581–590
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1002/cre2.365
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182698
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of micromotion of dental implants under immediate loading supported by Titanium (Ti) and Cobalt-Chrome (CoCr) superstructures.
Material and methods: A model of tridimensional half-edentulous maxilla with three dental implants was made using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Two standard and one zygomatic implants were connected to a superstructure with an elliptic section of 6x 3 mm (mm). Two study models were established. Model A: Titanium (Ti) alloy superstructure; Model B: Cobalt-Chrome (Co-Cr) alloy superstructure. To simulate an immediate-loading situation, a friction coefficient of 0.71 was applied between the implant and the bone surface. An axial load of 252.04 [N] was applied on standard and zygomatic implants.
Results: The Micromotion of dental implants was similar in both superstructure situations. The amount of micromotion was slightly higher in B1 and B3 models (Co-Cr alloy-superstructure) compared with A1 and A3 models (Titanium alloy superstructure). The micromotion values in two groups were greater than 150 mu m in the incisive region (standard implant) and molar region (zygomatic). In general, the micromotion was higher on the implant that received the load with respect to the other implants. The greater difference was observed when the load was applied on the standard implant A1 (Model A1 = 189.12 mu m) compared with standard implant B1(Model B1 = 263.25 mu m). Conclusions: Within the limits of present study, all implants on different load
application points showed micromotion; in general, the amount of micromotion was slightly higher in the implants connected with Co-Cr alloy superstructure.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Wiley
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States