Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorLions Maitre, Séverin
Authordc.contributor.authorMonsalve, Carlos
Authordc.contributor.authorDartnell Roy, Pablo Ricardo Gabriel
Authordc.contributor.authorGodoy, María Inés
Authordc.contributor.authorCórdova, Nora
Authordc.contributor.authorJiménez, Daniela
Authordc.contributor.authorBlanco, María Paz
Authordc.contributor.authorOrtega, Gabriel
Authordc.contributor.authorLemarié, Julie
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T15:04:29Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-05-24T15:04:29Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Education October 2021 Volume 6 Article 731763es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.3389/feduc.2021.731763
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/185677
Abstractdc.description.abstractMiddle bias has been reported for responses to multiple-choice test items used in educational assessment. It has been claimed that this response bias probably occurs because test developers tend to place correct responses among middle options, tests thus presenting a middle-biased distribution of answer keys. However, this response bias could be driven by strong distractors being more frequently located among middle options. In this study, the frequency of responses to a Chilean national examination used to rank students wanting to access higher education was used to categorize distractors based on attractiveness level. The distribution of different distractor types (best distractor, non-functioning distractors horizontal ellipsis ) was analyzed across 110 tests of 80 five-option items administered to assess several disciplines in five consecutive years. Results showed that the strongest distractors were more frequently found among middle options, most commonly at option C. In contrast, the weakest distractors were more frequently found at the last option (E). This pattern did not substantially vary across disciplines or years. Supplementary analyses revealed that a similar position bias for distractors could be observed in tests administered in countries other than Chile. Thus, the location of different types of distractors might provide an alternative explanation for the middle bias reported in literature for tests' responses. Implications for test developers, test takers, and researchers in the field are discussed.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado 3190273 FONDEF 16I10090 ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Advanced Research in Education) FB0003 ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Mathematical Modeling) AFB170001es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceFrontiers in Educationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectAssessmentes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectEducational testses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMultiple-choicees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectResponse placementes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDistractorses_ES
Títulodc.titleThe position of distractors in multiple-choice test items: the strongest precede the weakestes_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States