The position of distractors in multiple-choice test items: the strongest precede the weakest
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lions Maitre, Séverin
Author
dc.contributor.author
Monsalve, Carlos
Author
dc.contributor.author
Dartnell Roy, Pablo Ricardo Gabriel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Godoy, María Inés
Author
dc.contributor.author
Córdova, Nora
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jiménez, Daniela
Author
dc.contributor.author
Blanco, María Paz
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ortega, Gabriel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lemarié, Julie
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-24T15:04:29Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-05-24T15:04:29Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Frontiers in Education October 2021 Volume 6 Article 731763
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.3389/feduc.2021.731763
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/185677
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Middle bias has been reported for responses to multiple-choice test items used in educational assessment. It has been claimed that this response bias probably occurs because test developers tend to place correct responses among middle options, tests thus presenting a middle-biased distribution of answer keys. However, this response bias could be driven by strong distractors being more frequently located among middle options. In this study, the frequency of responses to a Chilean national examination used to rank students wanting to access higher education was used to categorize distractors based on attractiveness level. The distribution of different distractor types (best distractor, non-functioning distractors horizontal ellipsis ) was analyzed across 110 tests of 80 five-option items administered to assess several disciplines in five consecutive years. Results showed that the strongest distractors were more frequently found among middle options, most commonly at option C. In contrast, the weakest distractors were more frequently found at the last option (E). This pattern did not substantially vary across disciplines or years. Supplementary analyses revealed that a similar position bias for distractors could be observed in tests administered in countries other than Chile. Thus, the location of different types of distractors might provide an alternative explanation for the middle bias reported in literature for tests' responses. Implications for test developers, test takers, and researchers in the field are discussed.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
ANID: Fondecyt postdoctorado 3190273
FONDEF 16I10090
ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Advanced Research in Education) FB0003
ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Center of Excellence (Center for Mathematical Modeling) AFB170001
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States