The role of site conditions on the structural damage in the city of Valdivia during the 22 May 1960 Mw 9.5 megathrust Chile earthquake
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pastén Puchi, César Rodrigo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Campos, Felipe
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ochoa Cornejo, Felipe Agustín
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ruiz Tapia, Sergio Arturo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Valdebenito, Galo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Alvarado, David
Author
dc.contributor.author
Leyton, Felipe
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moffat, Ricardo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-26T14:55:19Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-05-26T14:55:19Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2021
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Seismological Research Letters Volume 92 • Number 6 • November 2021
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1785/0220190321
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/185702
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
The 22 May 1960 Mw 9.5 Valdivia megathrust earthquake, with a rupture length close to
1000 km in the central–south Chile, is the largest recorded earthquake in the modern
times. The city of Valdivia is located about 300 km south of the northern boundary of the
rupture in front of one of the largest asperities of the earthquake. In this article, we analyze the geology of the city and results from geophysical exploration methods that could
explain the observed pattern of structural earthquake-induced damage. Surface waves
methods results indicate that the soils in Valdivia have shear-wave velocity in the upper
30 m VS30 ranging from 150 to 300 m= s, whereas horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios
(HVSRs) calculated from ambient seismic noise show predominant vibration periods
between 0.6 and 1.4 s. The housing stock in Valdivia at the time of the earthquake mainly
consisted of one- and two-story wooden buildings, and fewer masonry and reinforcedconcrete buildings. Our reinterpretation of the data indicates that despite the large seismic
demand and the low shear-wave velocities, well-designed, well-constructed, and founded
structures were barely damaged. Most of the structural damage concentrated in hybrid
structural systems, poorly designed and constructed structures, and structures with deficient foundations build over uncontrolled backfills that experienced lateral movement and
differential settlement. The predominant vibration periods from the HVSR do not correlate
with the most damaged areas, but it seems to correlate with the depth of the soil deposit.
The reduced damage of the larger structures in the city at the time of the earthquake may
be partially explained because their vibration periods did not resonate with the predominant vibration period of the soil, in addition to their large structural redundancy.
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Seismological Soc Amer
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States