A review of the heterogeneous landscape of biodiversity databases: opportunities and challenges for a synthesized biodiversity knowledge base
Author
dc.contributor.author
Feng, Xiao
Author
dc.contributor.author
Enquist, Brian J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Park, Daniel S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Boyle, Brad
Author
dc.contributor.author
Breshears, David D.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Gallagher, Rachael V.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lien, Aaron
Author
dc.contributor.author
Newman, Erica A.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Burger, Joseph R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Maitner, Brian S.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Merow, Cory
Author
dc.contributor.author
Li, Yaoqi
Author
dc.contributor.author
Huynh, Kimberly M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Ernst, Kacey
Author
dc.contributor.author
Baldwin, Elizabeth
Author
dc.contributor.author
Foden, Wendy
Author
dc.contributor.author
Hannah, Lee
Author
dc.contributor.author
Jorgensen, Peter M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Kraft, Nathan J. B.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Lovett, Jon C.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Marquet Iturriaga, Pablo Angel
Author
dc.contributor.author
McGill, Brian J.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Morueta Holme, Naia
Author
dc.contributor.author
Neves, Danilo M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Núñez Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Oliveira Filho, Ary T.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Peet, Robert K.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Pillet, Michiel
Author
dc.contributor.author
Roehrdanz, Patrick R.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Sandel, Brody
Author
dc.contributor.author
Serra Díaz, Josep M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Simova, Irena
Author
dc.contributor.author
Svenning, Jens-Christian
Author
dc.contributor.author
Violle, Cyrille
Author
dc.contributor.author
Weitemier, Trang D.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Wiser, Susan
Author
dc.contributor.author
López Hoffman, Laura
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2022-07-28T19:59:02Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2022-07-28T19:59:02Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2022
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2022;31:1242–1260
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1111/geb.13497
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/187026
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Aim Addressing global environmental challenges requires access to biodiversity data across wide spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales. Availability of such data has increased exponentially recently with the proliferation of biodiversity databases. However, heterogeneous coverage, protocols, and standards have hampered integration among these databases. To stimulate the next stage of data integration, here we present a synthesis of major databases, and investigate (a) how the coverage of databases varies across taxonomy, space, and record type; (b) what degree of integration is present among databases; (c) how integration of databases can increase biodiversity knowledge; and (d) the barriers to database integration. Location Global. Time period Contemporary. Major taxa studied Plants and vertebrates. Methods We reviewed 12 established biodiversity databases that mainly focus on geographic distributions and functional traits at global scale. We synthesized information from these databases to assess the status of their integration and major knowledge gaps and barriers to full integration. We estimated how improved integration can increase the data coverage for terrestrial plants and vertebrates. Results Every database reviewed had a unique focus of data coverage. Exchanges of biodiversity information were common among databases, although not always clearly documented. Functional trait databases were more isolated than those pertaining to species distributions. Variation and potential incompatibility of taxonomic systems used by different databases posed a major barrier to data integration. We found that integration of distribution databases could lead to increased taxonomic coverage that corresponds to 23 years' advancement in data accumulation, and improvement in taxonomic coverage could be as high as 22.4% for trait databases. Main conclusions Rapid increases in biodiversity knowledge can be achieved through the integration of databases, providing the data necessary to address critical environmental challenges. Full integration across databases will require tackling the major impediments to data integration: taxonomic incompatibility, lags in data exchange, barriers to effective data synchronization, and isolation of individual initiatives.
es_ES
Patrocinador
dc.description.sponsorship
National Science Foundation (NSF) ABI-1565118
HDR-1934790
synthesis center CESAB of the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB)
Electricite de France (EDF)
Center for Informatics Research on Complexity in Ecology (CIRCE) - Aarhus University Research Foundation
National Science Foundation (NSF) EF-0553768
iPlant/CyVerse via NSF DBI-0735191
es_ES
Lenguage
dc.language.iso
en
es_ES
Publisher
dc.publisher
Wiley
es_ES
Type of license
dc.rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States