Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorFeng, Xiao
Authordc.contributor.authorEnquist, Brian J.
Authordc.contributor.authorPark, Daniel S.
Authordc.contributor.authorBoyle, Brad
Authordc.contributor.authorBreshears, David D.
Authordc.contributor.authorGallagher, Rachael V.
Authordc.contributor.authorLien, Aaron
Authordc.contributor.authorNewman, Erica A.
Authordc.contributor.authorBurger, Joseph R.
Authordc.contributor.authorMaitner, Brian S.
Authordc.contributor.authorMerow, Cory
Authordc.contributor.authorLi, Yaoqi
Authordc.contributor.authorHuynh, Kimberly M.
Authordc.contributor.authorErnst, Kacey
Authordc.contributor.authorBaldwin, Elizabeth
Authordc.contributor.authorFoden, Wendy
Authordc.contributor.authorHannah, Lee
Authordc.contributor.authorJorgensen, Peter M.
Authordc.contributor.authorKraft, Nathan J. B.
Authordc.contributor.authorLovett, Jon C.
Authordc.contributor.authorMarquet Iturriaga, Pablo Angel
Authordc.contributor.authorMcGill, Brian J.
Authordc.contributor.authorMorueta Holme, Naia
Authordc.contributor.authorNeves, Danilo M.
Authordc.contributor.authorNúñez Regueiro, Mauricio M.
Authordc.contributor.authorOliveira Filho, Ary T.
Authordc.contributor.authorPeet, Robert K.
Authordc.contributor.authorPillet, Michiel
Authordc.contributor.authorRoehrdanz, Patrick R.
Authordc.contributor.authorSandel, Brody
Authordc.contributor.authorSerra Díaz, Josep M.
Authordc.contributor.authorSimova, Irena
Authordc.contributor.authorSvenning, Jens-Christian
Authordc.contributor.authorViolle, Cyrille
Authordc.contributor.authorWeitemier, Trang D.
Authordc.contributor.authorWiser, Susan
Authordc.contributor.authorLópez Hoffman, Laura
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T19:59:02Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-07-28T19:59:02Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2022
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationGlobal Ecol Biogeogr. 2022;31:1242–1260es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1111/geb.13497
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/187026
Abstractdc.description.abstractAim Addressing global environmental challenges requires access to biodiversity data across wide spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales. Availability of such data has increased exponentially recently with the proliferation of biodiversity databases. However, heterogeneous coverage, protocols, and standards have hampered integration among these databases. To stimulate the next stage of data integration, here we present a synthesis of major databases, and investigate (a) how the coverage of databases varies across taxonomy, space, and record type; (b) what degree of integration is present among databases; (c) how integration of databases can increase biodiversity knowledge; and (d) the barriers to database integration. Location Global. Time period Contemporary. Major taxa studied Plants and vertebrates. Methods We reviewed 12 established biodiversity databases that mainly focus on geographic distributions and functional traits at global scale. We synthesized information from these databases to assess the status of their integration and major knowledge gaps and barriers to full integration. We estimated how improved integration can increase the data coverage for terrestrial plants and vertebrates. Results Every database reviewed had a unique focus of data coverage. Exchanges of biodiversity information were common among databases, although not always clearly documented. Functional trait databases were more isolated than those pertaining to species distributions. Variation and potential incompatibility of taxonomic systems used by different databases posed a major barrier to data integration. We found that integration of distribution databases could lead to increased taxonomic coverage that corresponds to 23 years' advancement in data accumulation, and improvement in taxonomic coverage could be as high as 22.4% for trait databases. Main conclusions Rapid increases in biodiversity knowledge can be achieved through the integration of databases, providing the data necessary to address critical environmental challenges. Full integration across databases will require tackling the major impediments to data integration: taxonomic incompatibility, lags in data exchange, barriers to effective data synchronization, and isolation of individual initiatives.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) ABI-1565118 HDR-1934790 synthesis center CESAB of the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB) Electricite de France (EDF) Center for Informatics Research on Complexity in Ecology (CIRCE) - Aarhus University Research Foundation National Science Foundation (NSF) EF-0553768 iPlant/CyVerse via NSF DBI-0735191es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherWileyes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceGlobal Ecology and Biogeographyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBig dataes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBiodiversity informaticses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectBiogeographyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectDatabase integrationes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectFunctional traites_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTaxonomic systemes_ES
Títulodc.titleA review of the heterogeneous landscape of biodiversity databases: opportunities and challenges for a synthesized biodiversity knowledge basees_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcrbes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States