Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorWillson, Mary F. 
Authordc.contributor.authorArmesto, Juan J. es_CL
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2008-03-18T15:55:15Z
Available datedc.date.available2008-03-18T15:55:15Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2006-06
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationREVISTA CHILENA DE HISTORIA NATURAL Volume: 79 Issue: 2 Pages: 279-283 Published: JUN 2006en
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0716-078X
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/120000
Abstractdc.description.abstractIn recent years natural history has been derided by some scientists as an old-fashion endeavor that does not follow the model of "hard" science and therefore should be considered "dead" and replaced by modern ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation biology. We contend that natural history has much to offer to contemporary scientists and that it has a primary role in the creative process of generating novel hypotheses and designing significant field experiments and observations.en
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen
Publisherdc.publisherSOCIEDAD BIOLOGIA CHILEen
Keywordsdc.subjectSCIENTIFIC METHODen
Títulodc.titleIs natural history really dead? Toward the rebirth of natural historyen
Title in another languagedc.title.alternative¿Está realmente muerta la historia natural? Hacia el renacimiento de la historia naturalen
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record