Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorAguirre, C. A. 
Authordc.contributor.authorSalazar, G. D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLopez de Romaña, D. V. 
Authordc.contributor.authorKain Berkovic, Juliana 
Authordc.contributor.authorCorvalán Aguilar, Camila 
Authordc.contributor.authorUauy Dagach-Imbarack, Ricardo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-08-25T02:25:16Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-08-25T02:25:16Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2015 Feb; 69 (2):269-73en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.144
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/133088
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the validity of body fatness estimations based on skinfolds and bioelectrical iImpedance analyses (BIA) measurements compared to a three-component model (3C model) in prepubertal Chilean children, considering potential differences by sex and nutritional status. SUBJECTS/METHODS: Four hundred and twenty four Chilean children (198 females and 226 males) were assessed for body composition. Body fat percentage (BF%) was evaluated by Skinfold equations (Slaughter, Ramirez and Huang) and Bioelectrical impedance (BIA: Tanita BC-418MA) using both the equipment and the Ramirez equation. Measurements based on a 3C model constructed from total body water estimates by isotope dilution and from body volume estimates by air displacement plethysmography were used as gold standard. RESULTS: Coefficient of determination (R-2) values were higher in overweight and in the whole group of both gender. All slopes were differed significantly from 1, and most intercepts were significantly different from 0. Skinfold Equations: an underestimation of BF% was found for all equations, being higher with the Slaughter equation. BIA: Tanita underestimated BF% in all groups, whereas Ramirez equation shows an overestimation. CONCLUSIONS: Skinfolds and bio-impedance equations serve well to rank children according to their BF%. However, these methods are not accurate for describing body composition in prepubertal Chilean children.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia de Chile (Fondecyt) 1090252-1100206en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherNatura Publishing Groupen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectBioelectrical-impedance analysisen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectPrediction equationsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectFaten_US
Keywordsdc.subjectFatnessen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectMassen_US
Títulodc.titleEvaluation of simple body composition methods: assessment of validity in prepubertal Chilean childrenen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile