Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGonzález Cabrera, Cristian 
Authordc.contributor.authorGarrido Charad, Florencia 
Authordc.contributor.authorRoth Metcalfe, Alejandro Darío 
Authordc.contributor.authorMarín, Gonzalo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2015-09-08T18:07:02Z
Available datedc.date.available2015-09-08T18:07:02Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2015
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Comparative Neurology 523:1341–1358 (2015)en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1002/cne.23739
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/133483
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractRetinal inputs to the optic tectum (TeO) triggered by moving stimuli elicit synchronized feedback signals from two isthmic nuclei: the isthmi parvocelullaris (Ipc) and isthmi semilunaris (SLu). Both of these nuclei send columnar axon terminals back to the same tectal position receiving the retinal input. The feedback signals from the Ipc seem to act as an attentional spotlight by selectively boosting the propagation of retinal inputs from the tectum to higher visual areas. Although Ipc and SLu nuclei are widely considered cholinergic because of their immunoreactivity for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT), contradictory findings, including the expression of the vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGluT2) mRNA in Ipc neurons, have raised doubts about the purely cholinergic nature of this nucleus. In this study, in chicks, we revise the neurochemical identity of the isthmic nuclei by using in situ hybridization assays for VGluT2 along with three cholinergic markers: the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT), the high-affinity choline transporter (CHT1) and ChAT. We found that neurons in the SLu showed strong mRNA expression of all three cholinergic markers, whereas the expression of VAChT mRNA in the Ipc was undetectable in our essays. Instead, Ipc neurons exhibited a strong expression of VGluT2 mRNA. Immunohistochemistry assays showed VGluT2 immunoreactivity in the TeO codistributing with anterogradely labeled Ipc axon-terminal boutons, further supporting a glutamatergic function for the Ipc nucleus. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that, in the chick, whereas the feedback from the SLu to the TeO is indeed cholinergic, the feedback from the Ipc has a marked glutamatergic component.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipFONDECYT 1110281; 1080252en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoen_USen_US
Publisherdc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectNucleus isthmien_US
Keywordsdc.subjectTectofugal pathwayen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSpatial attentionen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectNeurochemical identityen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:nlx_84100en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:nlx_84530en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:OMICS_02343en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_514497en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_2315140en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_2239153en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_90661en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_2313581en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_2336126en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_10562420en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID:AB_10562715en_US
Keywordsdc.subjectRRID: nif-0000-24345en_US
Títulodc.titleThe Isthmic Nuclei Providing Parallel Feedback Connections to the Avian Tectum Have Different Neurochemical Identities: Expression of Glutamatergic and Cholinergic Markers in the Chick (Gallus gallus)en_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile