Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorGarreaud Salazar, René 
Authordc.contributor.authorFalvey, M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMontecinos, A. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T16:38:27Z
Available datedc.date.available2016-07-01T16:38:27Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2016
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Hydrometeorology Volumen: 17 Número: 4 Páginas: 1185-1202 (2016)en_US
Identifierdc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0170.1
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/139350
General notedc.descriptionArtículo de publicación ISIen_US
Abstractdc.description.abstractThe Nahuelbuta Mountains (NM) are a semielliptical massif 1300 m high in coastal southern Chile (37 degrees-38 degrees S) facing frontal storms that move from the Pacific. Mean precipitation between 900 and 1200 mm yr(-1) is observed in the surrounding lowland, but river flow measurements suggest values >= 3000 mm yr(-1) atop the mountains. To verify and characterize such marked orographic enhancement, 15 rain gauges were deployed around and over the NM. The observations were supplemented by a high-resolution WRF simulation and linear theory (LT) modeling during the winter of 2011. The estimated mean precipitation increases gradually from offshore (~1000 mm yr(-1)) to the north-facing foothills (2000 mm yr(-1)). The precipitation rapidly increases in the upslope sector to reach ~4000 mm yr(-1) over the northern half of the NM elevated plateau, and decreases farther south to reach background values 20-30 km downstream of the mountains. The upstream (downstream) orographic enhancement (suppression) was relatively uniform among storms when considering event accumulations but varied substantially within each storm, with larger modifications during pre- and postfrontal stages and minor modifications during the brief but intense frontal passage. WRF results are in good agreement with observations in terms of seasonal and daily mean rainfall distributions, as well as temporal variability. Given its linear, steady-state formulation, the LT model cannot resolve rainfall variability at short (hourly) time scales, which in WRF is at least characterized by transient, mesoscale rainbands. Nonetheless, the rainbands are mobile so the accumulation field at monthly or longer time scales produced by the linear model is remarkably similar to its WRF counterpart.en_US
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipCR2/FONDAP-15110009; FONDECYT-1110169; FONDECYT-1140637; CHRIAM/CONICYT/FONDAP-15130015en_US
Lenguagedc.language.isoenen_US
Publisherdc.publisherAMER METEOROLOGICAL SOCen_US
Type of licensedc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Keywordsdc.subjectOrographic effectsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectModel comparisonen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectModels and modelingen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectFrontsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectCirculation/ Dynamicsen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectSouth Americaen_US
Keywordsdc.subjectGeographic location/entityen_US
Títulodc.titleOrographic Precipitation in Coastal Southern Chile: Mean Distribution, Temporal Variability, and Linear Contributionen_US
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Chile