Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorPrimo, Emiliano N. 
Authordc.contributor.authorBollo Dragnic, Soledad 
Authordc.contributor.authorRubianes, María D. 
Authordc.contributor.authorRivas, Gustavo A. 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2018-07-27T19:49:03Z
Available datedc.date.available2018-07-27T19:49:03Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2018
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationElectrochimica Acta Volumen: 259 Páginas: 723-732es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.184
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/150404
Abstractdc.description.abstractThis work is focused on the critical analysis of the non-covalent modification of a thiolated-gold surface with different grapheneous materials and the covalent attachment of bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a model protein. The main goal was to find a relationship between the nature and amount of the grapheneous nanomaterial, the amount of immobilized protein, and the electrochemical and plasmonic properties of the resulting platforms. The characterization of the grapheneous nanomaterials (graphene oxide (GO), GO modified with chitosan (CHIT), (GO-CHIT), and chemically reduced GO-CHIT (RGO-CHIT)) was performed by using FTIR, Raman, TGA, Dynamic light scattering (DLS), UV-Vis spectroscopy and zeta-potential measurements. The characterization of the thiolated-gold surfaces modified with the different nanomaterials and BSA was performed using surface plasmon resonance (SPR), cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The pH of the grapheneous materials dispersions demonstrated to be a critical parameter to control the assembly of the nanomaterials and the model protein at the gold surfaces and, consequently, the electroactivity and plasmonics of the resulting platforms. When using GO, the optimum pH is 8.00 while in the case of GO-CHIT and RGO-CHIT, pHs << pKa,(CHIT) are the most adequate. We demonstrated that in the case of our model system, if the detection method depends on the direct quantification of the amount of BSA immobilized at the platform (like SPR), the use of GO is the best option; while if the detection mode depends on the changes in the electrochemical response of a redox marker (like EIS), the selected grapheneous material should be RGO. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipCONICET SECyT-UNC ANPCyT (Argentina) National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development-CHILE FONDECYT 1161225 National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development-CHILE FONDAP 15130011 Argentina-Chile International Collaboration Grant CONICYT/MINCYT CH/13/03//PCCI130050es_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science LTDes_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
Sourcedc.sourceElectrochimica Actaes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGraphene-derived materialses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectNon-covalent assemblyes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectGold platformses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectElectrochemistryes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectSurface plasmon resonancees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectProtein-based platformses_ES
Títulodc.titleImmobilization of graphene-derived materials at gold surfaces: Towards a rational design of protein-based platforms for electrochemical and plasmonic applicationses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorrgfes_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación ISIes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile