Structural implications of a class of flexible functional forms for profit functions
Author
dc.contributor.author
López Vega, Ramón
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2018-08-30T16:20:43Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2018-08-30T16:20:43Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
1985
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
International Economic Review, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Oct., 1985), pp. 593-601
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.issn
0020-6598
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.2307/2526705
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/151395
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
In 1973, Diewert proposed the use of various Flexible Functional Forms (FFF)
for profit functions. Since then, the use of FFF specifications for profit functions
in empirical production analysis has become increasingly popular (Woodland
[1977]; Kohli [1978]; Cowing [1978]; Sidhu and Baanante [1981], etc.). A
number of alternative FFF specifications are available which may seem equally
plausible. In fact, the choice among FFF for empirical applications is typically
a purely arbitrary decision. The central problem considered in this paper is
whether some FFF impose more or less a priori restrictions on the structure of
production. The purpose of this note is to show that indeed an important class
of FFF, when used to represent profit functions, impose quite undesirable
restrictions on the production technology. These restrictions include quasi-
homotheticity and certain additional separability structures of the underlying
production technology. A paper by Blackorby, Primont and Russell [1977]
shed some doubt on the flexibility of FFF when certain separability conditions
are imposed. It proved that the flexibility of these forms rest indeed on very
feeble grounds, being extremely sensitive to weak separability restrictions. These
forms do not provide second order local approximations to an arbitrary weakly
separable function. What we demonstrate here is that an important family of FFF
does impose serious structural rigidities on the underlying production structure
even if weak separability is not imposed.
We first present a simple taxonomy of flexible functional forms which allows
us to classify them into two major families according to certain key differences.
Next, we show that one of these families imposes quasi-homotheticity and certain
separability conditions on the underlying production technology. In section 3,
we provide some general comments concerning the implications of these results
as a potential basis for discriminating among FFF in empirical analysis. We
end this note with a summary of the major conclusions.