Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorWelt, Travis S. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMassone Sánchez, Leonardo 
Authordc.contributor.authorLafave, James M. 
Authordc.contributor.authorLehman, Dawn E. 
Authordc.contributor.authorMcCabe, Steven L. 
Authordc.contributor.authorPolanco, Pablo 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T13:30:42Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-05-29T13:30:42Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2017
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationJournal of Structural Engineering (United States), Volumen 143, Issue 4, 2017
Identifierdc.identifier.issn07339445
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001682
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/168953
Abstractdc.description.abstractObservations following recent earthquakes, and from structural testing, indicate numerous brittle compression failures in rein-forced concrete seismic-resisting walls. This is unexpected, as most seismic-resisting walls are designed to be tension-controlled. The prob-lematic compressive response led to two independent studies, each individually aimed at identifying design and loading parameters that affectthe seismic deformability of the compression regions (or boundary elements) of seismic-resisting walls. These experimental studies arecombined here for a more complete understanding. Both studies used axially loaded, rectangular reinforced concrete specimens that simulateseismic-resisting wall boundary elements. The rectangular prisms were tested under cyclic axial loading or monotonic compression, with afocus on the following parameters: boundary element detailing classification, detailing of transverse reinforcement, maximum tensile strainpreceding compressive demand, and cross-sectional aspect ratio. Test results indicate that expected strength and deformation capacity can beoverestimated unless a rectangular hoop restrains every longitudinal reinforcing bar; use of crossties does not guarantee stability of thelongitudinal reinforcement. Tensile strains of 2 and 5%, imposed prior to reaching the compressive capacity, resulted in compression strengthreductions of 20 and 50%, respectively, indicating that load-history can also be important.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceJournal of Structural Engineering (United States)
Keywordsdc.subjectBoundary element detailing
Keywordsdc.subjectBoundary elements
Keywordsdc.subjectConcrete and masonry structures
Keywordsdc.subjectCyclic loading
Keywordsdc.subjectEarthquake engineering
Keywordsdc.subjectLaboratory testing
Keywordsdc.subjectReinforced concrete
Keywordsdc.subjectStructural walls
Títulodc.titleConfinement behavior of rectangular reinforced concrete prisms simulating wall boundary elements
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile