Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorChudinzow, Dimitrij 
Authordc.contributor.authorHaas, Jannik 
Authordc.contributor.authorDíaz Ferrán, Gustavo 
Authordc.contributor.authorMoreno Leiva, Simón 
Authordc.contributor.authorEltrop, Ludger 
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2019-10-22T03:11:19Z
Available datedc.date.available2019-10-22T03:11:19Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2019
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationSolar Energy 183 (2019) 812–822
Identifierdc.identifier.issn0038092X
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.071
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/171914
Abstractdc.description.abstractBifacial photovoltaics (bifacial PV) offer higher energy yields as compared to monofacial PV. The development of appropriate models for simulating the energy yield of bifacial PV power plants is a major topic in both research and industry. In particular, the adequate calculation of the energy yield from ground-reflected irradiance (GRI) is challenging. The purpose of this work is to investigate the currently available energy yield models and suggest areas for improvement. A new model with the proposed enhancements is used to investigate the behaviour of bifacial PV power plants in more detail. The model calculates the absorbed irradiation originating from eight irradiance contributions for the front and rear of each cell string: DNI, DHI, GRI from DHI (GRIDHI) and GRI from DNI (GRIDNI). The model was tested using a defined case study power plant. The breakdown of absorbed irradiation (subscript “ab”) into its contributions revealed that while in summer months GRIDNI-ab-rear is significantly larger than GRIDHI-ab-rear, both are roughly the same in winter months. Furthermore, for the calculation of GRI the common simplification of infinitely long module rows was avoided by implementing an algorithm for the view factor calculation for a three-dimensional space. This procedure allowed for the assessment of impact of the ground size on the annual energy yield. In a sensitivity analysis, it has been shown that the extension of the relevant ground area resulted in an asymptotical increase of the energy yield. Additionally, the impact of ground shadows on the power plant's performance was quantified. The presence of ground shadows reduced the annual electricity generation by almost 4%, compared to a hypothetical scenario where no ground shadows existed. Finally, five different ground surfaces and the resulting bifacial gains were analysed. The results show that while dry asphalt (12% reflectivity) gave less than 6% of bifacial gain related to generated electricity (BGel), the use of a white membrane (70%) would result in 29% of BGel.
Lenguagedc.language.isoen
Publisherdc.publisherElsevier
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/
Sourcedc.sourceSolar Energy
Keywordsdc.subjectAlbedo
Keywordsdc.subjectChile
Keywordsdc.subjectGround-reflected irradiance
Keywordsdc.subjectOptical model
Keywordsdc.subjectPV
Títulodc.titleSimulating the energy yield of a bifacial photovoltaic power plant
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revista
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorlaj
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publicación SCOPUS
uchile.cosechauchile.cosechaSI


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile