Multipurpose reservoir operation: a multi-scale tradeoff analysis between hydropower generation and irrigated agriculture
Author
dc.contributor.author
González, José M.
Author
dc.contributor.author
Olivares Alveal, Marcelo
Author
dc.contributor.author
Medellín Azuara, Josué
Author
dc.contributor.author
Moreno Vieyra, Rodrigo
Admission date
dc.date.accessioned
2020-07-15T20:43:43Z
Available date
dc.date.available
2020-07-15T20:43:43Z
Publication date
dc.date.issued
2020
Cita de ítem
dc.identifier.citation
Water Resources Management Jun 2020
es_ES
Identifier
dc.identifier.other
10.1007/s11269-020-02586-5
Identifier
dc.identifier.uri
https://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/176001
Abstract
dc.description.abstract
Reservoir operations often require balancing among several water uses. Despite the non-consumptive nature of hydropower, conflicts exist between irrigation and hydropower due to a demand seasonality mismatch. Hydropower operations are scheduled as part of a large-scale power grid, whereas irrigation decisions takes place at a smaller scale, most often the river basin. Balancing these water uses should involve a co-optimization at the power grid level, integrating all basins contributing hydropower to the grid. However, grid-wide co-optimization is not always possible due, for instance, to separate regulatory settings between water uses. For those cases, we propose a basin-wide co-optimization approach that integrates two decision scales-power grid and river basin- into a hydro-economic model. Water for irrigation is usually allocated by water rights or binding contracts, represented as constraints on grid-wide power operation models. We propose a water allocation scheme that integrates monthly marginal benefits of water for irrigation and hydropower at the basin level. Monthly water demand functions for irrigation are developed using an agricultural economic model, and marginal benefits of hydropower production are derived from a cost-minimization, grid-wide power scheduling model. Results for 50 inflow scenarios show that the proposed basin-wide co-optimization provides an economically sound operation. Total benefits from water use in the basin are on average 2.5% higher than those obtained under mandatory irrigation. Moreover, expected benefits under co-optimization are 5.4% and 1.8% higher for irrigated agriculture and hydropower, respectively, alleviating the conflicts between water uses in the basin.