Show simple item record

Authordc.contributor.authorCorrea Araneda, Francisco
Authordc.contributor.authorNúñez, Daniela
Authordc.contributor.authorDíaz, Ma Elisa
Authordc.contributor.authorGómez Capponi, Francisco
Authordc.contributor.authorFigueroa, Ricardo
Authordc.contributor.authorAcuña, Jaquelinne
Authordc.contributor.authorBoyero, Luz
Authordc.contributor.authorEsse, Carlos
Admission datedc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T20:47:12Z
Available datedc.date.available2022-01-10T20:47:12Z
Publication datedc.date.issued2021
Cita de ítemdc.identifier.citationEcological Indicators 125 (2021) 107551es_ES
Identifierdc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107551
Identifierdc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/183618
Abstractdc.description.abstractForest wetlands are biodiversity hotspots that perform functions of vital ecological importance, but they are among the world’s most threatened ecosystems. Due to their high diversity of habitats and species, the study of their benthic macroinvertebrate communities is challenging, and there is no consensus on which sampling methods allow a better representation of these communities. Here we compared the performance of 3 sampling methods (hand net, corer and litterbags) in 2 temporary and 3 permanent forested wetlands in southern Chile, which were bimonthly sampled throughout a year, with 108 samples per wetland. Our results indicated that the greatest abundance and diversity were collected with the hand net, followed by the litterbags and the corer. The composition of communities collected by the hand net and litterbags were more similar between them than that of communities collected by the corer (where Chironomidae and Oligochaeta were common). We suggest that the combined use of the hand net and corer could provide a good representation of macroinvertebrate communities in forest wetlands, as they would allow recording most of the diversity, including taxa that are both sensitive and tolerant to stressors.es_ES
Patrocinadordc.description.sponsorshipComision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica (CONICYT) CONICYT FONDECYT 11170390 CHRIAM Centro de Recursos Hidricos para la Agricultura y la Mineriaes_ES
Lenguagedc.language.isoenes_ES
Publisherdc.publisherElsevieres_ES
Type of licensedc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
Link to Licensedc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
Sourcedc.sourceEcological Indicatorses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectCoreres_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectHand netes_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectLitterbagses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectMediterranean zoneses_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectPermanent water regimees_ES
Keywordsdc.subjectTemporary water regimees_ES
Títulodc.titleComparison of sampling methods for benthic macroinvertebrates in forested wetlandses_ES
Document typedc.typeArtículo de revistaes_ES
dc.description.versiondc.description.versionVersión publicada - versión final del editores_ES
dcterms.accessRightsdcterms.accessRightsAcceso abiertoes_ES
Catalogueruchile.catalogadorcfres_ES
Indexationuchile.indexArtículo de publícación WoSes_ES


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States